|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
| View Poll Results: How will you be handling Gears? | |||
| We are building a Gear Ground Pickup |
|
85 | 28.52% |
| We are building a Gearage that can only eject a Gear when the Pilot lifts it out. |
|
89 | 29.87% |
| We are building a Gearage that can eject Gears without waiting for the Pilot. |
|
113 | 37.92% |
| We forgot to read the manual to realize how important Gears are, so we won't be doing them. |
|
11 | 3.69% |
| Voters: 298. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Value of a Gear Ground Pickup
There has been a lot of scattered discussion regarding the pros and cons of having a Gear ground pickup. Now that teams (hopefully) have started finalizing designs and are in the process of building, I'm curious to know how many teams opted to go with a Gear ground pickup, and why?
Given that many teams are designing a "Gearage" which are essentially big boxes that can only eject a Gear when the pilot lifts the spring, how valuable can a Gear ground pickup be? I would call it likely that a majority of teams won't have the ability to eject a Gear without help from a Pilot. I would also call it likely that most Gearages will do a good job of containing Gears, and there will be relatively few Gears on the floor that weren't placed there intentionally. I think a Gear ground pickup does open up some interesting strategic possibilities, but are these worth the resources, time and effort to develop vs. a simple box? |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Value of a Gear Ground Pickup
Since no one out there really cares too much what 1339 is planning (not like tier one teams, at least), I'll go ahead and tell you. We have designed for floor pickup of GEARS on the opposite end of the robot from GEAR placement. We recognized that FUEL would be the primary focus of most top teams, but we wanted to take a different approach that would play to our strengths, and would potentially play a rare or unique role. I don't know if GEARS on the floor will be common or not, but I suspect that low level teams will be focusing on GEARS, and that the drop areas will be when they are loaded and unloaded, potentially cutting off future scoring chances. A reliable and fast floor pickup may end up being a clutch player. We also considered the possibility of a two or three GEAR autonomous, though we know that's remote. Who knows? The game is yet to be played, and floor pickups might be a dark horse.
|
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Value of a Gear Ground Pickup
Quote:
That said, climbing is more important than the gear upgrades. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Value of a Gear Ground Pickup
We're not investing in one for simplicity's sake, but I expect them to be valuable both for helping allies with preload gears (2 gear autons!) and with drops. While I still can't envision teams often dropping gears that are inside their gear funnels, some teams will--at least initially--struggle with loading station lineup. Even if it doesn't happen in many matches, an opponent dropping a gear at their loading station is a massive gift that most alliances won't be able to take advantage of. We'll also see some fumbles at the airship even from passive lifts, for instance with drivers pulling away too soon or gears slowly falling off springs and not landing back in the funnel.
Point being, as some passive frisbee loaders demonstrated in 2013, FRC matches ensure sufficient failure modes even for electromechanically simple mechanisms. It's hard to predict how common they'll be at your particular qual matches, but they're highly valuable to pickups when they do. Good luck to you! EDIT: Ground pickups and their allies (or whoever) may also be able to force fumbles at the airship, hitting robots while they're around the peg to release or have their pilot lift. I still envision these as being difficult to pick up and steal given the sight lines, but I guess could camera work and field traffic strategy may be able to negate that. The ceiling for useful complementary technologies to a gear floor pickup is quite high. Last edited by Siri : 26-01-2017 at 08:26. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Value of a Gear Ground Pickup
Each alliance will have 21 gears available (18 from loading station + 3 from autonomous). An alliance would have to drop 10 gears before they would need the floor pickup to finish the airship.
Having seen what method many teams are using for holding gears, I don't expect alliances to drop enough gears to make sacrificing other aspects worth having the ground pickup. It will cost packaging space and build time, things that could be used to make or improve a shooter, climber, hopper, or fuel pickup. Assuming that it's faster than getting a gear from the human player, it also makes an easy target for defense while picking up a gear anywhere other than the loading station. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Value of a Gear Ground Pickup
Quote:
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Value of a Gear Ground Pickup
I think the during quake a robot that can pick up gears off the ground will be fairly valuable due to robots dropping Hera's in bad places. This will become less useful in elims or district champs due to team's refining their holders and deployers and practicing deploying gears for at least 2 comps. The ground pickup may not be needed at all in later elims assuming that the robot with ground pickup can also accept Hera's from the station without having to have them drop out.
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Value of a Gear Ground Pickup
At low levels gears will be dropped, but it won't be worth the time for a low level robot to attempt to pick up the gears.
At a medium level, gears will be occasionally dropped and an intake might be valuable. At high levels gears will rarely be dropped, and might be valuable to be picked up by high level robots, but it's doubtful. Gear pick ups might be valuable at some lower level regionals that are carried by medium-high teams, but that is the only situation I see them maybe being viable. |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Value of a Gear Ground Pickup
We are not doing a lot of other things. Low, fast, strong pushing, stable, and focused on quick gears. Climbing as well, but no FUEL. We've often made the mistake of holding on to the dream of doing it all in the first week of designing, but this year we were able to let it go, and be at peace with our limitations. Personally, I'm very glad that we did.
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Value of a Gear Ground Pickup
Quote:
|
|
#11
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Value of a Gear Ground Pickup
We racked our brains on this one, but we couldn't justify the space commitment in our strategy. So we won't go from floor to peg, but we may come up with a way to escort floor gears closer for a partner that can.
|
|
#12
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Value of a Gear Ground Pickup
I wonder how gear pickups will work when the gear is supported by the sea of fuel.....
![]() I do expect that we will need to practice clearing dropped gears from in front of the chutes. And lifts. |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Value of a Gear Ground Pickup
I will add that we figured out sufficient geometry to incorporate both a floor GEAR pickup and a FUEL hopper into the robot, though we are forgoing FUEL altogether. My point is that it wouldn't be impossible to do both.
|
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Value of a Gear Ground Pickup
I hope to see some ground intakes for gears, combined with an intake for fuel. I think it's very possible and very useful.
|
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Value of a Gear Ground Pickup
Quote:
Good luck |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|