|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Inertial Measurement vs. Vision Tracking
About 6-10 Hz. I could make it faster.
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Inertial Measurement vs. Vision Tracking
6-10hz should work. There is also the issue of processing a moving pic (blurred). With Vision Tracking alone, you really don't want to be stopping the robot to take a pic.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Inertial Measurement vs. Vision Tracking
I use a very fast shutter speed, (by setting low exposure and brightness) and it still picks up the target, so I'm not overly worried about blurring.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Inertial Measurement vs. Vision Tracking
I don't know, why don't you tell us.
Who is the better programmer? Are you doing the drive straight on gear, or the one of the two outside gears? I believe the drive straight gear can be done with a simple gyro, event better if a IMU, and some encoders. I believe that the outside ones with distance and turn will need something to compensate/correct for the issues with the turn and longer distances. Just my gut with no data, so I think you should test both, and determine the accuracy. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|