Go to Post People aren't getting angry at teams who play defense. They are getting angry at the teams who play BattleBots in the middle of a FIRST match. - dlavery [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > FIRST > General Forum
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #14   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 26-01-2017, 15:21
Oblarg Oblarg is offline
Registered User
AKA: Eli Barnett
FRC #0449 (The Blair Robot Project)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 1,116
Oblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Machining Sponsorship for FRC Teams

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cory View Post
If a tech company offers to pay for the machining I see no difference between that and a machine shop donating the labor directly. It's just the tech company donating the service in that case. I would argue parts made in either scenario could be used without accounting for FMV of the labor.
Okay, let's take this and run with it.

Money is fungible. Is it substantively different if said tech company donates $5000 to my team, and specifies that it is for machining, or if they donate $5000 without said specification and we spend it on machining? Even if the budget works out exactly the same regardless of said specification?

I think it's pretty silly to argue that these are somehow fundamentally different situations - in fact, if we say that they are, then anyone can get around this rule simply by going to sponsors who have donated money and asking those sponsors to specify (somewhat meaninglessly) that the money is to be used for machining. Which means that, if we follow this logic, any machining that is ultimately paid for by money that comes from a sponsor ought to not count towards the robot budget.

If this is indeed how the rule works: Great! The rule is effectively not there, and there's no problem.

But I doubt that this is how the rule works, and thus the rule seems utterly defective.
__________________
"Mmmmm, chain grease and aluminum shavings..."
"The breakfast of champions!"

Member, FRC Team 449: 2007-2010
Drive Mechanics Lead, FRC Team 449: 2009-2010
Alumnus/Technical Mentor, FRC Team 449: 2010-Present
Lead Technical Mentor, FRC Team 4464: 2012-2015
Technical Mentor, FRC Team 5830: 2015-2016
Reply With Quote
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:11.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi