|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Key Scouting Points?
This year I've been the one to spearhead the dive into the scouting programs, with a very different objective than in the past. I noticed our past leaders have seemed to ask the question of "What data can we collect?" and figure out what to make of the data after it's collected. This year, we're asking "What information can we give to our drivers to perform better?".
We've separated this into two sections: Game-to-game strategy and Top-8 strategy. Our data in the past has been oriented towards which teams we should pick if we reach the top 8 (Top-8 strategy), but now we're trying to include the strategies that change our game play from round to round (game-to-game strategy). My questions for the game-to-game strategy are as follows:
Thanks for your time and I look forward to your input. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Key Scouting Points?
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Cycle Time - How long is their cycle? Does adding a few seconds to it make a difference? This year it might be the difference between starting the 4th rotor or not. Coach - Your coach needs to have match awareness. Score call outs, strategy tweaks on the fly, that sort of thing. Quote:
I imagine other teams would listen if you input on match strategy - nothing gets you on a DNP list like being uncooperative. Last edited by CalTran : 05-02-2017 at 21:14. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Key Scouting Points?
CalTran,
Thanks for the input. I agree with much of what you're saying and I think your input on cycle times will be very beneficial to our scouting data. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Key Scouting Points?
I think an important question is, what do you need to know about your partners to formulate a good strategy? This largely depends on your robot. Here are a couple examples:
Last edited by Brian Maher : 05-02-2017 at 22:19. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Key Scouting Points?
As a past driver, the most useful information for me during qualifications would have been any quick easy tactics to shut down the next opposing alliance (maybe all of the bots cannot intake balls of the ground, so go dump all the hoppers right away. Stuff like that.). Or ways to show off our own bot to the higher ranking teams if we aren't doing well.
If you're in a position to pick, find a strategy that you want to aim for for your alliance and fill that alliance to the best of your ability. Example: my team's 2016 bot could not shoot high goals, but we could play great defense. We HAD to pick two high goal shooters. Didn't matter if they weren't the highest percentage shooters. We had to have the two best that we could get. So if you know this strategy that you need for playoffs, scout to find those teams. During playoffs, same thing about the shut down tactics as in quals. This info has to be fast and furious coming from the stands down to the drivers. Drivers don't have much time to analyze the data, so come to a conclusion and tell the drivers that, don't hand them a folder of stat sheets for them to try and scan through. Feel free to ask questions if my jumbled mess of text wasn't clear enough. TL;DR Scouters need to know the game; come up with an overall strategy; fill a planned alliance if you're picking; give drivers answers and ideas, not just data. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Key Scouting Points?
I have found that there is no difference in the data you should collect based on whether you are scouting for Alliance Selection or Qualification Matches.
For Qualification matches, you need to know the capabilities (Strengths) and weaknesses of all 6 robots in the match. Yes, you should be scouting yourself. In Qualification Matches, the strategy is based on the capabilities of partners and the tendencies and capabilities of opponents. You need to be honest about your own capabilities and you need to know your partners' capabilities. (Yes, some teams may exaggerate their capabilities). For Alliance selection, you need to know what you do well and where you need help, establish a strategy which you believe will give you the best chance of success and select the partners which complement you and complete that strategy. What you may want to consider is having a set of scouts who are focused on the upcoming partners and opponents who can provide the freshest perspective to the drive team for their match strategy discussion. These folks would be separate from the scouting team collecting the data for later evaluation during alliance pick list development. Video of matches to confirm or correct scouting data is also helpful, too. |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Key Scouting Points?
Quote:
Ex: On our scouting app, we have an option for teams that have climbing mechanisms to say if they successfully climbed or not, but also one to say they didn't have the chance. I'm worried data will be skewed if a team says they can climb (but actually can't b/c part is broken or part is jammed), and scouters mark it as didn't get the chance to climb purely because they have the parts to do it on the bot. Is this something I should be worried about or is this reading into the situation too much? Quote:
I also heard someone recommend we have trained scouters that are watching most all of the matches (say it's a team of 24 so 12 rotate out every couple of games). Thoughts on that type of scouting? What does your team do? Quote:
TL;DR What do your teams do that make scouting more unique or efficient than the next? |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Key Scouting Points?
Quote:
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Key Scouting Points?
We are trying a lot of new and ambitious things with scouting this year, moving from a paper/digital hybrid to fully digital is going to enable us to pull some of our match scouting data for qualification strategy discussions.
The biggest data points we are looking for are pretty much the same for our partners and our opponents. Where do robots prefer to shoot fuel from? Does that encroach upon our firing position? Is the firing position of an opponent robot predictable and susceptible to defense? How many gears can our entire alliance place on average and/or max? How many gears can our opponents place on average and/or max? This info might tell us which number rotor to shoot for. There is no sense in going for the 4th rotor unless the data says the alliance can do it. Similarly, we can make a prediction of how far the opposing alliance might try to go, and make the decision if its worth playing defense or not on gear placement. From past experience as drive coach and strategist, unless you have hard data to backup an alliance strategy, the chance that the match is going to go the way you planned it is very low. |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Key Scouting Points?
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|