|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: MindSensors SD540C Issues
Thank you for your reply.
I didn't say the Talons were hard to wire, just that the SD540C controllers were more conducive to cleaner wire management. Since we are likely moving back to the Talons, the way we managed the wiring for the SD540C will also work quite well for the Talons. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: MindSensors SD540C Issues
Quote:
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: MindSensors SD540C Issues
Quote:
Also, to answer OP's question, this may just be the reality of the motor controllers. SD540(B) controllers were found not to be very reliable, and were outclassed by the SPARK in every way. Based on other people's teardowns of the original SD540, I assume this motor controller is using very cheap construction methods and components, leading to these failures. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: MindSensors SD540C Issues
Quote:
[QUOTE-bobbysq;1642584]Also, to answer OP's question, this may just be the reality of the motor controllers. SD540(B) controllers were found not to be very reliable, and were outclassed by the SPARK in every way. Based on other people's teardowns of the original SD540, I assume this motor controller is using very cheap construction methods and components, leading to these failures.[/quote] Thank you for this information, this is the first real information we've received. Do you have links to these teardowns that I can share with the electronics team? (I will also search, but if you have them at hand...) |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: MindSensors SD540C Issues
Quote:
These things could certainly have improved though. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: MindSensors SD540C Issues
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|