|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
pic: 2" Mecanum
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: 2" Mecanum
Have you guys tested these? I have always wanted to try 3d printing mecanum intake wheels but have not found a design/ filiment combination that I thought would hold up to robot to robot contact.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: 2" Mecanum
Very cool! I would love to see some durability tests on these just because the material around the rollers looks a bit thin, but for intake purposes they look very capable.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: 2" Mecanum
Where did you buy the rollers? Would you mind sharing the CAD file?
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: 2" Mecanum
It looks like those are printed as well.
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: 2" Mecanum
They actually look injection molded to me, but I might be wrong.
All in all, the look great! I will say, I think you could add a little bit of a fillet to all those interior angles and see some substantial gains in durability. Also, will these wheels ever be outside of your bumpers? |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: 2" Mecanum
Awesome! What was the manufacturing process for the rollers? Mind sharing the material choice? It's awesome that it looks like you don't have to run a brass sheath on the inner surface.
Are the lock nuts really <1/4" across? I haven't been able to source anything less than 1/4" wide off McMaster, which has made packaging the fasteners difficult. Or do you just accept that the nuts break the plane of the wheel, since it's only an intake for a round game piece? |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: 2" Mecanum
Those look like rubber rollers...
|
|
#9
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: 2" Mecanum
If you're printing your own vectored intake wheels anyways, you should totally experiment with the roller angle to see what shoves the balls sideways the fastest. If I'm understanding Ether's mecanum kinematics paper and reasoning correctly (questionable propositions, both) then making the rollers more perpendicular should move the balls sideways faster. Maybe. Completely perpendicular or parallel both obviously fail, so maybe 45 is the fastest, but it just feels like something else should be.
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: 2" Mecanum
Quote:
|
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: 2" Mecanum
This is the first batch I have printed with the hex bore and they have held up pretty well. The intake is inside the robot this year, so I am an not too concerned.
|
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: 2" Mecanum
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|