|
|
|
 If this strategy backfires on any alliance that attempts it, they will have no one to blame but themselves. Be smart - know the risks before proceeding. - Travis Hoffman [more] |
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#13
11-05-2003, 13:53
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
The past two years have been like that.
I like the idea of slightly different scoring systems during qualification and elimination rounds. That way teams can design aggressively for the playoffs, like 25 this year and 365 last year, knowing that they will probably get picked and will then excel in the playoffs. Or, teams can design all-around point-scoring machines to rise to the top of the seedings, enabling them to pick whoever they want to be partners. It certainly puts a premium on scouting, and results in more varied robot design. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| The PARC Breakdown | camtunkpa | Off-Season Events | 3 | 24-04-2003 06:29 |
| PARC Poll | Yan Wang | Off-Season Events | 0 | 21-04-2003 14:43 |
| NYC and SOCAL partial results | archiver | 2001 | 2 | 24-06-2002 02:24 |
| results from regionals | archiver | 2000 | 0 | 23-06-2002 22:31 |
| Screwed up results? | TheFork | 3D Animation and Competition | 18 | 18-05-2002 15:47 |
Threaded Mode