|
|
|
 To put it simply, its clearly become this. The teams that can score a lot, do well. Rather shocking, isn't it? It doesn't matter if you're a shooter, dumper, power dumper, gravity dumper, spitter, flinger, dunker, shumper, barfer, dropper, or whatchamacallit. Points are points. - Looking Forward [more] |
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#2
26-05-2003, 11:00
|
||||
|
||||
|
I think FSN should be a system, and design as many different programs as possible. If teams want to make their own then they will, but not all teams have people who know enough to write the program and if a basic program is provided I think more teams will take part in FSN.
Lindsey |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| FSN Jobs - Let's get rolling! | Jack | FIRST Scouting Network | 25 | 17-06-2003 17:24 |
| FIRST and Success: A Question of Definition | Madison | General Forum | 70 | 27-11-2002 08:42 |
| Small balls in 2001 competition | archiver | 2001 | 10 | 24-06-2002 03:59 |
| Curie Division Robots information... (not complete) | archiver | 2001 | 3 | 24-06-2002 03:13 |
| Just curious, how many robots could shoot or toss balls into the goal? | Alan Ing | General Forum | 7 | 13-05-2002 19:09 |
Threaded Mode