|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
categories
Since this is an area of great interest to me I would like to put in my 2 cents.
First of all, the comments that Mike Soukup made re:scouting are worth rereading - he is making good points from an experience base that few of us have. One key point is that ease-of-recording, simplicity, clarity - whatever you want to call it - is a huge factor in getting high-quality data from multiple sources. A couple of people have suggested categories of scouting data - I agree, and suggest the following four categories: 1. ROBOT FEATURES - descriptions of the hardware/software based on observations prior to or during events; can be self-submitted or objectively observed by others Example: # of drive motors 2. ROBOT RATINGS - subjective ratings made based on observations of actual robot performance during practice or matches; require consistent observation and the judgement of dedicated scouts Example: Pushing Ability (1=poor, 5=great) 3. ROBOT RESULTS - specific outcomes that must be observed during practice or matches; require consistent observation by dedicated scouts Example: First to the top (yes/no); Defend Top (yes/no); Tallest Stack Made (#bins) 4. MATCH INFO - basic match data taken from FIRST match listings and match results Example: Match Points (#points) I think all the gathered data will fall into one of these categories. What do you think? Ken |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Requirements- How to collect data? | Jeff Waegelin | FIRST Scouting Network | 8 | 15-06-2003 12:57 |
| Competition Scouting | pauluffel | Scouting | 31 | 09-01-2003 00:34 |
| Robot Scouting Database | archiver | 2001 | 10 | 24-06-2002 03:00 |
| Limiting PWM in pbasic | archiver | 2001 | 4 | 24-06-2002 00:38 |
| Distribution of data | soap108 | Scouting | 4 | 24-12-2001 09:23 |