|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
In general, I think most teams spend more and more time on FIRST during each of the six and a half weeks. I think adding to this would just cause teams to put things off more. And as a college student I need as much time as possible after the building period to catch up on schoolwork. I wouldn't complain if they made it a week longer, but I don't think their would be any significant benefit of doing so.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| What if FIRST changed back to 2 coaches? | D.J. Fluck | General Forum | 45 | 08-01-2007 18:25 |
| How We Could've Changed the Culture But Didn't. | Madison | General Forum | 44 | 04-02-2006 21:32 |
| Chippy (Atwood) output changed | Rob Colatutto | Motors | 2 | 04-01-2003 21:38 |
| Rules Question | archiver | 2001 | 13 | 23-06-2002 23:58 |
| New FIRST Ruling -Wow the implications | Mike Martus | General Forum | 51 | 07-02-2002 22:03 |