|
|
|
 When we design these systems ask " would I want my Mom (or daughter) standing next to this thing when it goes off? - Mike Betts [more] |
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
| View Poll Results: Which method do you think was better? | |||
| Best out of 3 (Used in 2003 IRI) |
  
|
46 | 97.87% |
| Elimination Points (Used during the 2003 FIRST season) |
  
|
1 | 2.13% |
| Voters: 47. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#2
20-07-2003, 20:07
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
I thought the IRI way was great! It made it so much more exciting during the finals. The only proof you need is in the final round. During the FIRST season, a close match like Finals 1 would have meant certain victory for 494's alliance. With best of 3, 308's alliance was able to pull off two amazing performances, and take the win. That kind of excitement is how a FIRST competition should be... 3 great matches, not one match followed by de-scoring. Elimination Points inhale audibly. Best of 3 was the right way to go.
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| IRI Human Competition | Dave Scheck | Off-Season Events | 7 | 17-07-2003 10:29 |
| More teams in the elimination rounds | DougHogg | General Forum | 16 | 27-04-2003 16:11 |
| What happened at IRI? | Jeff Rodriguez | Off-Season Events | 38 | 24-07-2002 18:39 |
| "Official" IRI Announcement | David Kelly | Off-Season Events | 35 | 04-06-2002 18:32 |
Threaded Mode