|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
| View Poll Results: Which method do you think was better? | |||
| Best out of 3 (Used in 2003 IRI) |
|
46 | 97.87% |
| Elimination Points (Used during the 2003 FIRST season) |
|
1 | 2.13% |
| Voters: 47. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
2 out of 3
Like so many other things, the eliminations at IRI proved to be handled better than the "regular season". Perhaps it was the foresight of the IRI crew that it would be more exciting. Perhaps it was the hindsight that the eliminations at Regionals and at Houston were not very exciting. One way or the other, it was much better. 2 out of 3, hands down.
If only all the competitions could be similar to the IRI. If FIRST was able to develop the game, and test it sufficiently (a tall order for sure - but effectively the entire season would be similar to the post season is now), then we'd have the same consistency in referees and the same excitement throughout the competition that the IRI seems to excel at year after year. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| IRI Human Competition | Dave Scheck | Off-Season Events | 7 | 17-07-2003 10:29 |
| More teams in the elimination rounds | DougHogg | General Forum | 16 | 27-04-2003 16:11 |
| What happened at IRI? | Jeff Rodriguez | Off-Season Events | 38 | 24-07-2002 18:39 |
| "Official" IRI Announcement | David Kelly | Off-Season Events | 35 | 04-06-2002 18:32 |