|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
| View Poll Results: Championship configuration for seeding - your choice. | |||
| As is, Thursday - 3 practices and 6 total seeding |
|
26 | 57.78% |
| Thursday 1 practice and 8 seeding matches |
|
19 | 42.22% |
| Thursday NO practice and 8+ seeding matches |
|
0 | 0% |
| Voters: 45. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#9
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Seeding
Yes I was referring to Championship. there would be plenty of room.
What is of concern is the fact that divisions of 72 teams means that without at least 8 seeding matches you cannot sort out the strong teams from the weak teams, 10 seeding matches is way better. With alliances ( if they still have them ) a team can be in the top 8 and have been carried there by great alliance partners ( that can always happen, but the more matches, the more it won't be as much a factor. One other possibility is more teams playing at one time. In the past several years 4 teams play at a time. What if it was say 6 teams. The through put is 50% better, which means more seeding matches. A game could be designed for 6 teams, we did it at a CDI ( Chief Delphi Invitational ) several years ago and it worked great. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 2004 Championship Eligibility Criteria!!! | dez250 | General Forum | 214 | 28-12-2003 20:11 |
| Championship Qualification - Constructive Criticism | Andy Baker | Championship Event | 7 | 29-10-2003 16:48 |
| QotW 6-01-03: The Championship | Madison | Rumor Mill | 13 | 02-06-2003 06:06 |
| Championship Registration Filled | Travis Hoffman | Championship Event | 0 | 01-04-2003 21:20 |