|
|
|
 well yeah, but we can dream, can't we? - Nuttyman54 [more] |
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
| well yeah, but we can dream, can't we? - Nuttyman54 [more] |
|
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#23
10-09-2003, 12:55
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Not a Differential
Jnadke,
What you describe in your design theory section is exactly what the CCT is with using bevel gears. The differential without the second gear, as you describe, is not a differential at all. It is a planetary gear set. As you describe it, it would work EXACTLY like the CCT from 217, but it is not a differential. By definition, when you remove the second inside bevel, it is no longer a differential. I will put together a little paper showing the physics (with numbers and equations) behind Tytus' gearbox design, but I am fairly confident it will behave as Bill Beatty and I have described. -Paul 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| pic: LEGO Vernier Gearbox | CD47-Bot | Extra Discussion | 9 | 10-10-2003 09:43 |
| pic: dual speed gearbox | CD47-Bot | Extra Discussion | 9 | 07-10-2003 15:04 |
| pic: Gerrish Gearbox MK-III | CD47-Bot | Extra Discussion | 22 | 04-09-2003 16:32 |
| pic: Gerrish Gearbox MKII | CD47-Bot | Extra Discussion | 63 | 03-07-2003 00:06 |
Threaded Mode