|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
I agree Jeremy
it's obvious just from the reactions, that some aspects of the system are a little confusing and could use clarification - which I'm hopeful will be coming.
Regarding your tier placement question - would this wording help understand it more: A team is placed in a tier based on "the last year they attended the Championship OR (if they have NEVER attended the Championship) how many years they have participated in FIRST without attending the Championship."? Your concern is valid, but don't worry - it's not the case. Teams who have not gone in 3 years will be two tiers above those who have not gone in 1 year - regardless of if they have ever gone or not. Don't know if that wording (which is my interpretation, NOT an official wording from FIRST) helps clarify or not. JM |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Using an Operator Interface with the 2004 EDU RC wirelessly | Dave Flowerday | Robotics Education and Curriculum | 34 | 19-04-2004 19:06 |
| Championship Qualification - Constructive Criticism | Andy Baker | Championship Event | 7 | 29-10-2003 16:48 |
| 2004 Championship Qualification? | Andy Baker | Championship Event | 9 | 19-09-2003 12:26 |
| Championship Eligibility Criteria | Joe Lambie | Rumor Mill | 2 | 26-08-2003 22:25 |
| QotW 6-01-03: The Championship | Madison | Rumor Mill | 13 | 02-06-2003 06:06 |