Go to Post Remember to ALWAYS use physics in engineering discussions. There is really no room for "feelings" in this sort of thing. - JVN [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > FIRST > General Forum
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 25-10-2003, 05:35
Ben Mitchell Ben Mitchell is offline
Registered User
no team
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Bridgewater, NJ
Posts: 566
Ben Mitchell has a reputation beyond reputeBen Mitchell has a reputation beyond reputeBen Mitchell has a reputation beyond reputeBen Mitchell has a reputation beyond reputeBen Mitchell has a reputation beyond reputeBen Mitchell has a reputation beyond reputeBen Mitchell has a reputation beyond reputeBen Mitchell has a reputation beyond reputeBen Mitchell has a reputation beyond reputeBen Mitchell has a reputation beyond reputeBen Mitchell has a reputation beyond repute
Uniform rules and enforcers?

During my three years in FIRST, I've noticed that FIRST is a lot like The Matrix.

Some rules can be bent, others broken, others enforced half the time, others not enforced at all.

I believe that there should be some more concrete definitions in the rulebook of what phrases like "intentional damage" mean. At one regional, it was only evoked if damage was done due to the opposing alliance's actions on a robot directly. At another, it was evoked when no damage was done. At the championships, it was only used if serious damage was done (and not needed, in the end, in my division).

At some regionals, 'mouse-bot' machines were disallowed, at others, allowed. Some out of tape measures totally against the rules - still allowed.

I've heard some horror stories filtering out of regionals with teams using 4 drill motors, simply switching motors when the judges left.

Or teams designing robots in a way to flip others simply by design (wedge) yet were not disqualified outright for creating a robot designed to flip others. (This was common enough for me to notice at competitions)

I've heard of team getting away with things simply because they had people on the inspecting staff, or perhaps no one thought thier robot would do well, and thus let them use duct tape on thier machine.

My question is fourfold.

1) What does it take to be a referee/inspector? - Don't get me wrong, most of them do a fine job, but some of them seemed to have some bias that would interfere with judging an event.

2) Would some sort of entrance exam based on the rules of the game be a good idea to ensure that refs all have a good understanding of the rules?

3) If FIRST really wants to grow, wouldn't they need paid refs, just like real sports' organizations?

4) Would random inspections be a good idea?
__________________
Benjamin Mitchell

Vex Robotics Competition team advisor (4 high school teams)
Reply With Quote
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 25-10-2003, 07:29
Gadget470's Avatar
Gadget470 Gadget470 is offline
A Fire Outside
AKA: Brandon Joerges
no team (Alpha Omega)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Madison Heights, MI
Posts: 1,000
Gadget470 is a jewel in the roughGadget470 is a jewel in the roughGadget470 is a jewel in the roughGadget470 is a jewel in the rough
Send a message via ICQ to Gadget470 Send a message via AIM to Gadget470
I can't really answer the first 1 & 3, but I think 2 &4 are definitly good ideas... But only if the "random" inspector is not the original inspector. This would remove bias that the original may have had due to team friendlieness, etc.


Perhaps also some intercommunication of rule interpretation?

Say for the first regionals of the season, there are more than one (I don't know off-hand). The head ref's from each regional should talk with eachother at Lunch break on Thursday and Friday about any rule occurances that are questionable. (Such as the 'mouse-bot'). They should decide what should be allowed, then the rest of the regionals should follow suit.

What happens if Regional #1 doesn't allow 'mouse-bots' and Regional #7 allows them. Team X attends regionals 1 and 7 but removes a key strategy from their bot on Thursday because they think it's not going to be allowed... Once again brings up the whole 'shafted' topic.
Reply With Quote
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 25-10-2003, 09:15
generalbrando's Avatar
generalbrando generalbrando is offline
Build, Break, Repeat
AKA: Brandon Mensing
FRC #0246 (Overclocked)
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 366
generalbrando is a splendid one to beholdgeneralbrando is a splendid one to beholdgeneralbrando is a splendid one to beholdgeneralbrando is a splendid one to beholdgeneralbrando is a splendid one to beholdgeneralbrando is a splendid one to beholdgeneralbrando is a splendid one to beholdgeneralbrando is a splendid one to behold
Send a message via AIM to generalbrando
"Then do you call being unjust being low-minded?"

"No, I call it good judgement."

We're never going to manage to stop everyone from cheating. I think that things could be a bit more strict and a bit more uniform (such as the suggestion by Gadget). Compare FIRST to a major sport and it seems like we need to get it together and make our rules concrete. But remember, we remake the game every year and spend less than 5 months on it before it is left to off season and then to history. So compare FIRST to something like Science Olympiad. From one competition to another there is no telling how close to the rules the administrator of the individual events will be. For instance, in Science of Fitness (an event dealing with anatomy, physiology, and nutrition) the rules once stated that we would be dealing with the heart and lungs, however the regional coordinator tested us on the intestinal system. Sorry to go off topic, but my point is that for how dynamic things are with FIRST, they do a pretty good job of keeping things consistent.
__________________
Lead Mentor of Team #246, Boston University Academy and Boston University, Overclocked
www.burobotics.org

Reply With Quote
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 25-10-2003, 12:29
dlavery's Avatar
dlavery dlavery is offline
Curmudgeon
FRC #0116 (Epsilon Delta)
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Rookie Year: 1996
Location: Herndon, VA
Posts: 3,176
dlavery has a reputation beyond reputedlavery has a reputation beyond reputedlavery has a reputation beyond reputedlavery has a reputation beyond reputedlavery has a reputation beyond reputedlavery has a reputation beyond reputedlavery has a reputation beyond reputedlavery has a reputation beyond reputedlavery has a reputation beyond reputedlavery has a reputation beyond reputedlavery has a reputation beyond repute
We just finished dealing with a whole issue regarding dress codes and stuff in our school district. It was a real pain. I am not sure that I would want to go through that all over again and make up a whole bunch of new FIRST uniform rules.

Oh, wait. Never mind...

-dave (just call me Emily Littela)
__________________
"I know what you're thinking, punk," hissed Wordy Harry to his new editor, "you're thinking, 'Did he use six superfluous adjectives or only five?' - and to tell the truth, I forgot myself in all this excitement; but being as this is English, the most powerful language in the world, whose subtle nuances will blow your head clean off, you've got to ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel loquacious?' - well do you, punk?"
- Stuart Vasepuru, 2006 Bulwer-Lytton Fiction Contest



My OTHER CAR is still on Mars!!!
Reply With Quote
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 25-10-2003, 12:44
KenWittlief KenWittlief is offline
.
no team
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 4,213
KenWittlief has a reputation beyond reputeKenWittlief has a reputation beyond reputeKenWittlief has a reputation beyond reputeKenWittlief has a reputation beyond reputeKenWittlief has a reputation beyond reputeKenWittlief has a reputation beyond reputeKenWittlief has a reputation beyond reputeKenWittlief has a reputation beyond reputeKenWittlief has a reputation beyond reputeKenWittlief has a reputation beyond reputeKenWittlief has a reputation beyond repute
if a team is violating the design rules, you CAN formally complain to the FIRST people (the head judge) and they will inspect the robot again.

If a team wins a match with a machine that violates the rules, then they can be disqualified AFTER that match is over.

as for tipping and lifting - its very difficult to determine if a bot is designed to push containers by lifting one edge, or to tip robots over.

if a robot is tipped over while engaged in a shoving match, that doesnt mean the other robot was designed to tip robots over.

If your robot is tipped over frequently, you have C.G. issues :c)
Reply With Quote
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 25-10-2003, 14:37
Wetzel's Avatar
Wetzel Wetzel is offline
DC Robotics
FRC #2914 (Tiger Pride)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Rookie Year: 1999
Location: DC
Posts: 3,522
Wetzel has a reputation beyond reputeWetzel has a reputation beyond reputeWetzel has a reputation beyond reputeWetzel has a reputation beyond reputeWetzel has a reputation beyond reputeWetzel has a reputation beyond reputeWetzel has a reputation beyond reputeWetzel has a reputation beyond reputeWetzel has a reputation beyond reputeWetzel has a reputation beyond reputeWetzel has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Wetzel
I know that at So Cal last year, a few of us went over the rules with the head ref Friday morning. He had obviously read the rules, but as we have seen, FIRST has had a diffcult time with the clairity of their rule writting. He had questions about when a 'rover' on top counted and when it didn't, with touching other 'rovers' and so on. They were very intelligent questions, but it seemed he had done nothing but read the FIRST rules. So there are two sides to this. By not having been involved, there isn't any bias, but then again he hasn't seen the precidents for the rules that had been set the previous weeks. That said, I've never seen anything resembling bias on the part of the refs.

Inspections, on the other hand, are a much more open to interpretation. For example, there can be no sharp edges. What is a sharp edge? What I was told would be a good thought would be to use the palm of my hand across it. Diffrent inspectors will think diffrent edges sharp.

Some things are obvious, motor count, types of motors. Duct tape can not be used as a fastener but it can, however, be used as a non functional decoration. (Covering sharp edges is not nonfunctional)

Also, in response to the to many motors, I keep hearing "I've heard that teams used to many motors" but have never seen this, nor heard anyone be able to confirm this. That would delagate it to the rumor mill, and there it should stay.


Wetzel
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Ask me about my inspections.
Reply With Quote
  #7   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 25-10-2003, 15:08
Madison's Avatar
Madison Madison is offline
Dancing through life...
FRC #0488 (Xbot)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Rookie Year: 1999
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 5,243
Madison has a reputation beyond reputeMadison has a reputation beyond reputeMadison has a reputation beyond reputeMadison has a reputation beyond reputeMadison has a reputation beyond reputeMadison has a reputation beyond reputeMadison has a reputation beyond reputeMadison has a reputation beyond reputeMadison has a reputation beyond reputeMadison has a reputation beyond reputeMadison has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Also, in response to the to many motors, I keep hearing "I've heard that teams used to many motors" but have never seen this, nor heard anyone be able to confirm this. That would delagate it to the rumor mill, and there it should stay.
I've seen a team show up to a regional with too many of one motor on their robot. They did not compete that way, however.
__________________
--Madison--

...down at the Ozdust!

Like a grand and miraculous spaceship, our planet has sailed through the universe of time. And for a brief moment, we have been among its many passengers.

Last edited by Madison : 25-10-2003 at 15:20.
Reply With Quote
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 25-10-2003, 21:43
Steve W Steve W is offline
Grow Up? Why?
no team
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Toronto,Ontario Canada
Posts: 2,523
Steve W has a reputation beyond reputeSteve W has a reputation beyond reputeSteve W has a reputation beyond reputeSteve W has a reputation beyond reputeSteve W has a reputation beyond reputeSteve W has a reputation beyond reputeSteve W has a reputation beyond reputeSteve W has a reputation beyond reputeSteve W has a reputation beyond reputeSteve W has a reputation beyond reputeSteve W has a reputation beyond repute
For a bit of clarity. Head refs have had communication with FIRST before the regional. Any discrepts are dealt with then. As more regionals happen more "angles" are covered.
Let's look at it another way. There are about 800 teams competing. Each one is pushing themselves, their robots and the rules to the limit. They are all trying to get the winning angle. FIRST has to design a new game every year and a few people try to implement rules to make the game work. What are the chances that all angles are covered and everyone would be happy. Many teams build their robots to work slightly outside of the rules to get an edge. They don't try to destroy other robots or the integrity of the game but they knowingly violate the spirit of the rules. Most of the teams when notified of their infraction fix the issue without complaints.
I guess the issue is Gracious Professionalism. Should we bend the rules to try and win? If every team followed the rules and the spirit of the rules then we wouldn't have any problems. This however will not happen as teams now need to win to advance. I believe though that MOST teams do and will follow the guidelines. That's what makes FIRST such a great environment. Lets hope that every team that follows these guidelines influence one other team. It won't take long for this type of forum to disappear.
Reply With Quote
  #9   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 25-10-2003, 23:02
T967's Avatar
T967 T967 is offline
5 IA teams, WHOs w/me?
AKA: Seth F.
no team
Team Role: Student
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Marion, Iowa
Posts: 241
T967 is on a distinguished road
Send a message via AIM to T967
quit whinin' that's all part of competition. If someone purposely damages you for no reason it's pretty appartent. For example: Running full speed into a dead bot on the corner of the field. Human error is what makes competition, competition.
__________________
Old dude wondering if he can really get back into this crazy thing called FIRST.
Reply With Quote
  #10   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 25-10-2003, 23:59
Ryan Dognaux's Avatar
Ryan Dognaux Ryan Dognaux is offline
FRC Video Review - Change is Coming
FRC #4329 (Lutheran Roboteers)
Team Role: Coach
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: St. Charles, MO
Posts: 2,673
Ryan Dognaux has a reputation beyond reputeRyan Dognaux has a reputation beyond reputeRyan Dognaux has a reputation beyond reputeRyan Dognaux has a reputation beyond reputeRyan Dognaux has a reputation beyond reputeRyan Dognaux has a reputation beyond reputeRyan Dognaux has a reputation beyond reputeRyan Dognaux has a reputation beyond reputeRyan Dognaux has a reputation beyond reputeRyan Dognaux has a reputation beyond reputeRyan Dognaux has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Ryan Dognaux
Re: Uniform rules and enforcers?

Quote:
Originally posted by Ben Mitchell
Would random inspections be a good idea?
Not a good idea, but a great idea. It would definately keep teams that tend to do some of these things on their toes.
__________________
Ryan Dognaux :: Last Name Pronounced 'Doane Yo'
Team 234 Alum: 2002 - 2005 :: Purdue FIRST Member: 2006 - 2009
Team 1646 Mentor: 2007 - 2009 :: Team 357 Mentor: 2009 - 2012
Team 4329 Mentor: Current
STL Off-Season Event: www.gatewayroboticschallenge.com
Reply With Quote
  #11   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 26-10-2003, 13:25
Ben Mitchell Ben Mitchell is offline
Registered User
no team
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Bridgewater, NJ
Posts: 566
Ben Mitchell has a reputation beyond reputeBen Mitchell has a reputation beyond reputeBen Mitchell has a reputation beyond reputeBen Mitchell has a reputation beyond reputeBen Mitchell has a reputation beyond reputeBen Mitchell has a reputation beyond reputeBen Mitchell has a reputation beyond reputeBen Mitchell has a reputation beyond reputeBen Mitchell has a reputation beyond reputeBen Mitchell has a reputation beyond reputeBen Mitchell has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally posted by T967
quit whinin' that's all part of competition.
Cheating is all a part of the competition?

Hmmm...how many drill motors do you use?


__________________
Benjamin Mitchell

Vex Robotics Competition team advisor (4 high school teams)
Reply With Quote
  #12   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 26-10-2003, 13:28
KenWittlief KenWittlief is offline
.
no team
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 4,213
KenWittlief has a reputation beyond reputeKenWittlief has a reputation beyond reputeKenWittlief has a reputation beyond reputeKenWittlief has a reputation beyond reputeKenWittlief has a reputation beyond reputeKenWittlief has a reputation beyond reputeKenWittlief has a reputation beyond reputeKenWittlief has a reputation beyond reputeKenWittlief has a reputation beyond reputeKenWittlief has a reputation beyond reputeKenWittlief has a reputation beyond repute
as for running into other robots

with the auton mode, its pretty much a given that this is going to happen - so your bot better be designed to take it.
Reply With Quote
  #13   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 26-10-2003, 17:50
Ryan Dognaux's Avatar
Ryan Dognaux Ryan Dognaux is offline
FRC Video Review - Change is Coming
FRC #4329 (Lutheran Roboteers)
Team Role: Coach
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: St. Charles, MO
Posts: 2,673
Ryan Dognaux has a reputation beyond reputeRyan Dognaux has a reputation beyond reputeRyan Dognaux has a reputation beyond reputeRyan Dognaux has a reputation beyond reputeRyan Dognaux has a reputation beyond reputeRyan Dognaux has a reputation beyond reputeRyan Dognaux has a reputation beyond reputeRyan Dognaux has a reputation beyond reputeRyan Dognaux has a reputation beyond reputeRyan Dognaux has a reputation beyond reputeRyan Dognaux has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Ryan Dognaux
Quote:
Originally posted by KenWittlief
as for running into other robots

with the auton mode, its pretty much a given that this is going to happen - so your bot better be designed to take it.
I think he's referring to the non-auto mode time. I think all of us know collision is bound to happen during auto time, but in human control time, excessive collision between robots generally isn't needed.
__________________
Ryan Dognaux :: Last Name Pronounced 'Doane Yo'
Team 234 Alum: 2002 - 2005 :: Purdue FIRST Member: 2006 - 2009
Team 1646 Mentor: 2007 - 2009 :: Team 357 Mentor: 2009 - 2012
Team 4329 Mentor: Current
STL Off-Season Event: www.gatewayroboticschallenge.com
Reply With Quote
  #14   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 27-10-2003, 01:16
Unsung FIRST Hero
Rich Wong Rich Wong is offline
NYC FIRST Planning Committee Member
no team (NYC FIRST)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Rookie Year: 1999
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 1,674
Rich Wong has a reputation beyond reputeRich Wong has a reputation beyond reputeRich Wong has a reputation beyond reputeRich Wong has a reputation beyond reputeRich Wong has a reputation beyond reputeRich Wong has a reputation beyond reputeRich Wong has a reputation beyond reputeRich Wong has a reputation beyond reputeRich Wong has a reputation beyond reputeRich Wong has a reputation beyond reputeRich Wong has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Rich Wong
Re: Uniform rules and enforcers?

Quote:
Originally posted by Ben Mitchell
During my three years in FIRST, I've noticed that FIRST is a lot like The Matrix.

My question is fourfold.

1) What does it take to be a referee/inspector? - Don't get me wrong, most of them do a fine job, but some of them seemed to have some bias that would interfere with judging an event.

2) Would some sort of entrance exam based on the rules of the game be a good idea to ensure that refs all have a good understanding of the rules?

3) If FIRST really wants to grow, wouldn't they need paid refs, just like real sports' organizations?

4) Would random inspections be a good idea?
Here is my 2 cents worth:

1) What does it take to be a referee/inspector?
Usually a head referee or a head inspector is assigned to regional by FIRST. It is usually a senior FIRST or FIRST volunteer with years of experience. But every year the challenge is different or new parts are added to the kits. Volunteer training unfortunately is short. Volunteers already commit a lot of time, 3 to 5 days, to a regional event which is enormously valuable. People are taking off from work , school, and family time to help run FIRST. Imagine asking them to send 1 to 2 more days from work or home to train for refereeing or inspection.

2) Would some sort of entrance exam based on the rules of the game be a good ideal to ensure that refs all have a good understanding of the rules?
Referees and inspector are trained but only occurring to the rules and guidelines FIRST gives them from their documentation. This become an disadvantage because the students, coaches and mentors playing the game knows more about the game's loopholes, misses, and problems than the volunteers who has to read thru 20+ team updates in a couple of hours.
It is almost impossible for the Head Referee and his volunteers to keep up with all the possible scenarios that can occur during field of play. And Inspectors have to play detective, cop and negotiator with some team that push the rules- I have seen some teams intentionally violate rules and some teams just don't interprete the rules correctly.
Last year FIRST asked for more Team members to volunteer will refereeing and inspecting. Tt is not perfect, it won't fix all the problems but a positive step for improvement.

3) If FIRST really wants to grow, wouldn't they need paid refs, just like real sports" organizations?
No. I think this would go against the mission of FIRST.

4) Would random inspections be a good idea?
Yes, and other teams have also helped by reporting violation to the inspector. Last year one team replace their whole front end which violated the weight limit by 15+ pounds; no respect for gracious professionalism.

FIRST reflects LIFE, it's not perfect, but worth living.
__________________
popularis de ob instinctus agnitionis scientia technologia
Home website: www.nycnjfirst.org
Member of NEMO & e^(i*pi)+1 Fraternity.
Member of Friends of Robots
Member of NYCFIRST Planning Committee
Reply With Quote
  #15   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 27-10-2003, 20:28
Matt Reiland's Avatar
Matt Reiland Matt Reiland is offline
'The' drive behind the drive
None #0226 (TEC CReW Hammerheads)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: May 2001
Rookie Year: 1999
Location: Troy Michigan
Posts: 712
Matt Reiland has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Reiland has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Reiland has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Reiland has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Reiland has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Reiland has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Reiland has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Reiland has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Reiland has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Reiland has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Reiland has a reputation beyond repute
Inspectors

Sadly enough I helped inspect robots at West Michigan and there were quite a few problems. Knowing our robot well and all of the rules made it pretty easy to spot obvious problems and yes I have seen teams use the wrong number of motors, the wrong breakers, wrong wiring on the pump, Victor 883's, modifications to the air cylinders, custom valves, you name it. The worst part about being an inspector or Judge is that even though you are there on your own time, including a hotel room!, people are upset that you re following the rules. And if a previous regional missed the rule violations shame on them, not shame on me for catching them. Especially the violations that are clearly labeled on the inspection sheet.
__________________
Robonaut Next Generation Control System Development

2003 GLR Champions (302,67,226)
2003 Buckeye Semi-Finalists(902,494,226)
2002 Nationals QuarterFinalists
2001 West MI QuarterFinalists
2000 GLR Semi-Finalists
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:57.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi