Go to Post Woo for speculation! - Eugenia Gabrielov [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > FIRST > General Forum
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 27-10-2003, 21:13
Jnadke Jnadke is offline
Go Badgers!
#0093
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Appleton, WI
Posts: 775
Jnadke is on a distinguished road
Send a message via ICQ to Jnadke Send a message via AIM to Jnadke Send a message via Yahoo to Jnadke
It sounds like you are trying to make a program where people can input data and get numbers out. For many of the instances you want equations for, you just cant do this. I would not want people to be misled. If this is not what you are trying to do, then disregard the rest of this post and let me know.

There's a reason Engineers exist, because engineering is about having a set of constraints and a goal, and figuring out how to come to a solution. No one solution is right, and many times there will be many more than one solution. Most of the time one solution will be more right than others due to factors completely unrelated to the problem.

I'll give you an example. Let's consider gear ratios, and apply it to first. The goal is to create a lightweight gearbox that accepts an input of 5000RPM and outputs 250 RPM. Since gear ratios are expressed as input : output or input/output, the gear ratio is 20:1.
The simplest, and most logical, way to do this is to have the motor have a pinion of 1" in diameter mated with a gear with a diameter of 20". Closer analysis reveals the option of having a two stage 5:1 and 4:1 reduction or a three stage 5:1 and 2:1 and 2:1 reduction. Which is more right? Well, a number of external factors have to be considered, such as cost, and more importantly weight. If each of these gears are 1" wide, the first solution would have a weight of 89lbs (steel has a density of 0.283 lb/in^3) (plus that of 1 shaft we'll assume each shaft is 1/2" in diameter and is ~4 in long, being 1 lb). The second solution would yield a weight of 11.5lbs and the third 11lbs. However, the cost and time (extra shaft and 2 extra gears) might be more important than the half pound so the 2nd solution might be considered the best.

That was only a slightly realistic example, but it does prove my point. There are simply too many variables to be considered to make one answer more right than others. For example, to save on weight you might choose a less dense material such as aluminum. However, aluminum has a rather low tensile strength compared to steel and you'll have to use larger gears (or accept the risk of fracture).



Simply said: No computer program can replace an engineer. There's simply too many variables to take into account. Typically, when programming you assume various things. However, in engineering nothing can be assumed.

Other than that, most of the equations are so basic that using a computer program to solve them would be purely a waste of time.
Most of the whitepapers around the Chiefdelphi (click up top "whitepapers" and read them) have all the equations one would need.
__________________
The best moments of our lives fall in two categories: those that did happen and those that did not.

Last edited by Jnadke : 27-10-2003 at 21:27.
Reply With Quote
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Logical statements or math formulas Manoel Programming 1 16-02-2002 23:29


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 18:21.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi