|
|
|
| I'm over the moon for you. |
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#16
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Do we need a bigger regional? Its interesting how 166 teams pre-qualified for the Championship and only 94 have signed up. I wonder what happens if the tier 2 teams fill it up after Nov 5.? Do the pre-qualified teams who did not sign up in time have to win a regional to still get in?
Raul |
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
No I'm pretty sure they are going to be able to go if they pre quallified... then again i could be wrong... What are the dates for when the tiers open up??? I know Tj doesn't have a shot getting in by the tier system since we are in tier 6...
|
|
#18
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Quote:
scratch that, WORLD Championship'(can't forget about our Brazilian and Canadian teams).But still, it would be cool to have a 500 team Champ. Last edited by cbudrecki : 08-11-2003 at 01:00. |
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
And tier six teams were in the first group to qualify, along with tiers 3-5, and prequalifying based on points and chairmans and stuff. 88 is in tier 1. Allison Last edited by Allison K : 08-11-2003 at 02:44. |
|
#20
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Quote:
![]() Unfortunately events do not scale linearly, the bigger it is, the more problems there are. |
|
#21
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Hey FIRST we need a bigger national!
the way FIRST is spreading.... i think that we should have more than one nationals or something to solve the problem of not every single team being able to compete at nationals....
|
|
#22
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Hey FIRST we need a bigger national!
adding another nationals??? you mean regional... there should be only one nationals... they just need a way to get more help so they can get more teams in...
|
|
#23
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Hey FIRST we need a bigger national!
"The Championships". Are they truly a championship? Not really. There should be one way to qualify...plain and simple...win. Win Win Win Win Win. Win a regional, runner-up at regional, win chairman's or the engineering inspiration. Doing the math there are what 30 regionals? That X 6 (runner up and winners) gives 180 teams. (Assuming nobody wins two) Add in regional chairman's winners (30) and regional eng. insp. winners (30) (again assume no repeats) right now we're only at 240. Then there are what 15 teams from all the years? Plus 12 previous national chairman's winners. Grand total=267 teams. divide by 4 divisions=67 teams per division. Again...this assumes that no previous chairman's winners win a regional or anything else that would lead to a team double qualifying.
Last edited by Collin Fultz : 10-12-2003 at 15:36. |
|
#24
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Hey FIRST we need a bigger national!
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Request for FLL Volunteers for FLL National Invitational at the FRC Championships | Natchez | General Forum | 3 | 08-04-2003 12:19 |
| top 10 things people said to me at National... | archiver | 2001 | 1 | 24-06-2002 03:20 |
| Beat the horse again | archiver | 2000 | 13 | 23-06-2002 23:52 |
| Proposal for a LAN at the National Competition | archiver | 2000 | 6 | 23-06-2002 22:18 |
| regualtion of nationals (team # limits) | Andrew Dahl | Rumor Mill | 89 | 14-07-2001 09:30 |