Go to Post Failure is not an option. - [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Technical > Technical Discussion
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 26-12-2003, 22:59
Veselin Kolev's Avatar
Veselin Kolev Veselin Kolev is offline
X51 Production Company PGM (TM)
no team
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: CA
Posts: 253
Veselin Kolev has a reputation beyond reputeVeselin Kolev has a reputation beyond reputeVeselin Kolev has a reputation beyond reputeVeselin Kolev has a reputation beyond reputeVeselin Kolev has a reputation beyond reputeVeselin Kolev has a reputation beyond reputeVeselin Kolev has a reputation beyond reputeVeselin Kolev has a reputation beyond reputeVeselin Kolev has a reputation beyond reputeVeselin Kolev has a reputation beyond reputeVeselin Kolev has a reputation beyond repute
Re: 3 shifting transmission...

ok... I know this thread had been dead for a few weeks but...

My question for you:
If you had a design for a 3 speed transmission, and the weight was 4 pounds per gearbox (without motors), and it wasn't SO complex, why not make it?
Ok, maybe my question should also include, what are the good sides of a 3 speed tranny? I've discussed it with my team's engineers and advisors.. and all I've gotten back is that it'll probably work but... "why do we need such a transmission".
Here's my reasons:
Pro:
- 3 speeds brings complexity and probability of innovation in design awards.
- if you gear it right, you can outrun and outpush almost anyone.
- nobody (almost) has made a 3 speed transmission.
- with my design, the complexity from 2 to 3 speeds doesn't increase that much. In fact, complexity from 3 to 4 or 5 speeds doesn't increase much either. It just gets bigger.
- if you make this transmission, and get your electrical people to make it automatic, you have a go at the leadership in control award.
- you can reach REALLY high top speeds
Con:
- 3 speeds brings complexity. Expensive, will take forever to machine, needs to be CNC'd, etc...
- why not 2 speeds? It seems that you will never need 3 speeds in a FIRST game.
- if something is mis-aligned... death of a gearbox. The complexity mixed with errors in manufacturing will kill you. But... holes can be line bored, so the misalignment problem is small.
- you will never have enough time or room the accelerate to 3rd gear

Thats all I can think of right now...
__________________
X51 Production Company
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
transmission Gregory Frechou Technical Discussion 16 19-11-2003 23:37
White Paper Discuss: Dual-motor, dual-speed drive transmission design CD47-Bot Extra Discussion 9 03-09-2003 10:40
322 Three speed transmission. dkeith Robot Showcase 8 10-06-2002 22:33
Which teams are using a transmission this year Todd Derbyshire Scouting 10 08-04-2002 10:21
Shifting Gears -- Anton Abaya Technical Discussion 26 22-01-2002 21:49


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:21.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi