Putting two and two together...

[Madison]

Originally Posted by KenWittlief

Twenty two!

Is that the number of threads started to discuss the same thing?

[Andy Grady]

Originally Posted by M. Krass

Is that the number of threads started to discuss the same thing?

I think that the autonomous button idea is a very valid idea that hasn't been discussed in depth yet. I feel that maybe, just maybe, Mr. Lavery wants us to think that because the song is "Stairway to Heaven" that there will be stairs in the field, instead of taking the near litteral meaning right from the lyrics. 2 Paths, but you can change the road you are on...

I guess im trying to spark conversation about the possibility that FIRST may be going for the concept of getting teams to run a full match autonomously.

[IMDWalrus]

All I know is that I'm confused as to what the lyrics mean, I can't wait until Saturday...

...and I've listened to "Stairway to Heaven" far too many times in the past day.

[KenWittlief]

two paths...

maybe you can let your bot run in auton mode for as long as YOU choose - and you get a higher score the longer you stay in auton mode

maybe even you can let it run for the whole match? or switch to manual overide from the bridge? (just in case)

[PMGRACER]

Studying the bill of materials today and reading the "Stairway to Heavan" hint, I wondered if there will be some sort of turntable in the middle of the field. We have done ramps, bridges, limbo bars, but never a turntable! What the heck are you going to do with 3 casters anyway? I also think there will be some sort of platform to get the bots' up onto. There are too many sheets of 4'x8' plywood not to have a platform. Also there are enough 2x12's to build some sort of riser. That is all I'm going to speculate on. I'll just be patiently waitng till Sat for the suprise.

[Matt_Kaplan1902]

I really like the idea that the longer oyu stay in auto mode the more points you get. I also think that their will be some sort of step-up, similar to the '99 puck, but a little higher and cannot be moved around.

Maybe there will be a goal that if you lift onto the platform you get a multiplier

Can't wait for that curtian to rise on saturday.

[Madison]

Originally Posted by Andy Grady

I think that the autonomous button idea is a very valid idea that hasn't been discussed in depth yet.

I don't think the speculation here is any more or less valid than the speculation that's happening everywhere else. I don't understand why it needs a separate thread, however. That's all.

[Andy Grady]

Originally Posted by M. Krass

I don't think the speculation here is any more or less valid than the speculation that's happening everywhere else. I don't understand why it needs a separate thread, however. That's all.

Well M, what I was trying to accomplish here was to spark conversation about an idea that I felt got lost deep in a thread. The idea of giving teams a choice to either run a full round in autonomous mode, run a partial round, or not run one at all, has the potential of making the game very interesting. When I posted this thread, I was hoping to spark up some good positive conversation about the pro's and con's of having a game with this kind of autonomous structure. Of course when you post speculation about a game, it is always hit or miss because people either bite and want to talk about it, or they decide to ignore it, reguardless of the thread. I created a seperate thread because I feel that highlighting certain ideas and aspects of the games for conversation, is better for the community as a whole than continuously feeding off the negative crap that tends to find its way to the board on a continuous basis. Its what this board was founded on since its creation. I know for fact that most of the wonderful role models that grace this board, i.e. Andy Baker, Joe Johnson, Raul, etc...would love to see less negativity here, and more of what the Chief Delphi Forum is truely all about, good solid meaningful discussion of ideas and FIRST concepts. The less positive meaningful conversation we spark, the more of a chance that people like these will find the idea of posting on this board as a waste of time.

My appologies for the firefight here M, but I took offense to your post. I feel I always try my best to keep things interesting on this board. But it takes people like you to help make those subjects truely work. The best way to do that, I have always found, is to analyze, not criticize.

Good Luck,
Andy Grady