Go to Post Anyway, it's a global program and a global world. - Christopher149 [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Technical > Motors
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Closed Thread
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-01-2004, 10:47
Joe P Joe P is offline
Registered User
#0647
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Killeen, Texas
Posts: 43
Joe P will become famous soon enoughJoe P will become famous soon enough
Unhappy CIM Motors to pull up Robot

I was considering using the CIM as a winch motor for the pull-up bar.

If our 130 lb. robot was directly under the bar and was pulling up from the center of mass, say 12 inches off the ground it would take a maximum torque of 130 lb*12 in = 1560 in-lb.

To keep the motor happy we will keep the load reflected back to the motor between 20-50% of Stall Torque.

CIM Stall Torque = 2.2 N*m which is 20 in-lb.
Running the motor ar 40% Stall Torque gives us Working Torque =20 in-lb*.4 = 8 in-lb

so Gear ratio for CIM woul be 1560 in-lb/ 8 in-lb = 195/1

If I am right, I am looking at too big of a gear reduction to make the motors work.
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-01-2004, 11:56
Ken Leung's Avatar Unsung FIRST Hero
Ken Leung Ken Leung is offline
Dare to Live!
FRC #0115 (Monta Vista Robotics Team)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: May 2001
Rookie Year: 1999
Location: Palo Alto, California
Posts: 2,390
Ken Leung has a reputation beyond reputeKen Leung has a reputation beyond reputeKen Leung has a reputation beyond reputeKen Leung has a reputation beyond reputeKen Leung has a reputation beyond reputeKen Leung has a reputation beyond reputeKen Leung has a reputation beyond reputeKen Leung has a reputation beyond reputeKen Leung has a reputation beyond reputeKen Leung has a reputation beyond reputeKen Leung has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Ken Leung
Re: CIM Motors to pull up Robot

[quote=Joe P]I was considering using the CIM as a winch motor for the pull-up bar.

If our 130 lb. robot was directly under the bar and was pulling up from the center of mass, say 12 inches off the ground it would take a maximum torque of 130 lb*12 in = 1560 in-lb.
QUOTE]

This is only true if you have a 12" lever arm at the shaft of the CIM motor. 12" off the ground isn't the right number, because no matter of far you are off the ground, the amount of torque you need to lift the robot remains the same if the speed of going upward remains the same.

It takes 130 lbs to lift up a robot. The stall torque is 20 in-lbs. If you have a winch, and the diameter of the winch is 5 inch, your motor can excert 4 lbs upward force at stall torque. 50% of that is 2 lbs upward force. 130 lbs / 2 lbs is 65:1 a reduction ratio. You should note that this is moving at 50% free speed, so you should check and see if this is too fast or not.
__________________
Hardware Test Engineer supporting RE<C, Google.

1999-2001: Team 192 Gunn Robotics Team
2001-2002: Team 100, 192, 258, 419
2002-2004: Western Region Robotics Forum, Score Keeper @ Sac, Az, SVR, SC, CE, IRI, CalGames
2003-2004, 2006-2007: California Robot Games Manager
2008: MC in training @ Sac, CalGames
2009: Master of Ceremony @ Sac, CalGames
2010: GA in training @ SVR, Sac.
2010-2011: Mechanical Mentor, Team 115 MVRT
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-01-2004, 13:09
KenWittlief KenWittlief is offline
.
no team
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 4,213
KenWittlief has a reputation beyond reputeKenWittlief has a reputation beyond reputeKenWittlief has a reputation beyond reputeKenWittlief has a reputation beyond reputeKenWittlief has a reputation beyond reputeKenWittlief has a reputation beyond reputeKenWittlief has a reputation beyond reputeKenWittlief has a reputation beyond reputeKenWittlief has a reputation beyond reputeKenWittlief has a reputation beyond reputeKenWittlief has a reputation beyond repute
Re: CIM Motors to pull up Robot

the 12" radius he quoted is at the winch

or do you intend to have a 12" lever arm that does the lifting?

I also recommend you look at pnumatics - with the regulators at 60psi you can get a cylinder that can produce much more than 130 lbs of force

all you need then is a latch to hold it extended when the power is cut.
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-01-2004, 13:40
sanddrag sanddrag is offline
On to my 16th year in FRC
FRC #0696 (Circuit Breakers)
Team Role: Teacher
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Glendale, CA
Posts: 8,516
sanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond repute
Re: CIM Motors to pull up Robot

Quote:
Originally Posted by KenWittlief
all you need then is a latch to hold it extended when the power is cut.
Could you expand on this a bit? Are you saying that a pneumatic cylinder will not hold it's position at the end of a match? I don't know since my team has never used them before.
__________________
Teacher/Engineer/Machinist - Team 696 Circuit Breakers, 2011 - Present
Mentor/Engineer/Machinist, Team 968 RAWC, 2007-2010
Technical Mentor, Team 696 Circuit Breakers, 2005-2007
Student Mechanical Leader and Driver, Team 696 Circuit Breakers, 2002-2004
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-01-2004, 14:00
Cory's Avatar
Cory Cory is offline
Registered User
AKA: Cory McBride
FRC #0254 (The Cheesy Poofs)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: May 2002
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Redwood City, CA
Posts: 6,814
Cory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Cory
Re: CIM Motors to pull up Robot

It will as long as you have pressure left in your accumulators.
__________________
2001-2004: Team 100
2006-Present: Team 254
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-01-2004, 14:04
sanddrag sanddrag is offline
On to my 16th year in FRC
FRC #0696 (Circuit Breakers)
Team Role: Teacher
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Glendale, CA
Posts: 8,516
sanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond repute
Re: CIM Motors to pull up Robot

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cory
It will as long as you have pressure left in your accumulators.
If you have a retracted cylinder, what exactly will happen (like to the solenoid) after the end of the match?
__________________
Teacher/Engineer/Machinist - Team 696 Circuit Breakers, 2011 - Present
Mentor/Engineer/Machinist, Team 968 RAWC, 2007-2010
Technical Mentor, Team 696 Circuit Breakers, 2005-2007
Student Mechanical Leader and Driver, Team 696 Circuit Breakers, 2002-2004
  #7   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-01-2004, 16:40
Gadget470's Avatar
Gadget470 Gadget470 is offline
A Fire Outside
AKA: Brandon Joerges
no team (Alpha Omega)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Madison Heights, MI
Posts: 1,000
Gadget470 is a jewel in the roughGadget470 is a jewel in the roughGadget470 is a jewel in the roughGadget470 is a jewel in the rough
Send a message via ICQ to Gadget470 Send a message via AIM to Gadget470
Re: CIM Motors to pull up Robot

Pneumatics are interesting.

Quick basic rule:
Pounds per Square inch * Area in sq. inches = Pound Force
PSI * Area[sq in] = F

Attached is a decent cutaway of a cylinder.

On a 2" Bore cylinder, the area (pi*r²) of the Bore-end is pi*(1²), or roughly 3.14 sq. inches.
Your maximum PSI at the cylinders is 60 PSI.

60 * 3.14 = 188.4 lbf

Meaning the cylinder can push OUT 188.4 lbs.

When retracting, the area of the Rod must be subtracted from the total area.
From the Pneumatics Manual, the rod diamter is .625", therfore radius is .3125"

So now you go:

Area Bore - Area Rod
pi*(1²) - pi*(.3125²)
pi - pi * .09765625
pi - .306... = 2.834 sq. inches

now again we do PSI * Area
60 * 2.834 = 170.04

(Note, the values for the other cylinders, as well as this one, are listed on pg. 12 of the Pneumatics Manual This is so you know WHY and HOW MUCH, not just HOW MUCH the cylinders can hold).

As put in the thread about pneumatics holding their air when power is cut..

A double solenoid valve will continue stay in the state which it was at before power was cut. If the tubing was set for Extended, it will stay extended. and vice versa.

A single solenoid valve will always return to it's default state. The valve uses an electromagnet to switch from ON to "Not ON" (Different from OFF). Note: regardless of how you are positioned when power is cut, the solenoid will go to the "Not ON" state.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	cylinder.JPG
Views:	69
Size:	24.1 KB
ID:	1681  
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-01-2004, 22:27
Matt Adams's Avatar
Matt Adams Matt Adams is offline
b(o_o)d
FRC #1525 (Warbots)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Arlington Hts. IL
Posts: 375
Matt Adams has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Adams has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Adams has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Adams has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Adams has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Adams has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Adams has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Adams has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Adams has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Adams has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Adams has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Matt Adams
Post Re: CIM Motors to pull up Robot

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken Leung
It takes 130 lbs to lift up a robot. The stall torque is 20 in-lbs. If you have a winch, and the diameter of the winch is 5 inch, your motor can excert 4 lbs upward force at stall torque. 50% of that is 2 lbs upward force. 130 lbs / 2 lbs is 65:1 a reduction ratio. You should note that this is moving at 50% free speed, so you should check and see if this is too fast or not.
Alrighty, I think that this is an important enough issue that I'd like to make a number of quick corrections. One of the most difficult problems I've had in the past was properly picking gear ratios... so I'll make a quick lesson here.

First and foremost... let's take a look at the CIM motor.

It has a stall current of 114 Amps, and a stall torque of 346.9 oz-in, which we'll switch over to 21.68 in-lbs since it's probably more applicable in this situation.

There's been talk of designing around the max power of motors, or 40% of the motor stall to optimize power, but this entire idea can lead to big trouble!

Designing the gear ratio around the max power is not the ideal situation in FIRST, since we're limited to the amount of current that the motors can pull without tripping the circuit breakers. Designing a gear ratio around the max power in this example is 114 * 50% = 57 Amps. Since I believe we're still on 40 amp breakers for the CIM motor, this would be a very poor choice, resulting in your robot being unable to lift itself!

Instead, design your components around a safe current draw, such as 35 Amps.

Solving:
114 * X = 35 A
X = 30.7% of max (stall) torque, which is 6.66 in-lbs.

Now, to look back at the problem, if the winch has a diameter of 5 inches, the radius will be 2.5 inches, which is the moment arm. However, I have a hunch that Ken was just typing a bit too quick, so I'll assume he meant a 5 inch radius / moment arm.

With this said, we need a torque equal to:
5 inches * 130 lbs = 650 in-lbs.

Since we know that we want to run at 6.66 in-lbs, we'll need to create an arm gearbox that has 650 / 6.66 ratio, or 97.65 : 1.

Including a moderate factor of safty of 1.3 or so.. I'd say you'd like at least a reduction of 125 : 1.

To reduce this massive reduction, simply reduce the size of the moment arm. Half size moment arm = half gear ratio.

I hope this helps! Good luck!

Matt
__________________
Matt Adams - Engineer at Danaher Motion
Team 1525 - Warbots - Deerfield High School
Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How much planning goes into your robot? Jnadke General Forum 41 29-01-2006 21:29
Shifting Gears MBosompra Technical Discussion 71 23-07-2004 02:49
WASH Palm scouting at the Championship Mike Soukup Scouting 2 19-04-2002 15:14
"Motors and Drive train edition" of Fresh From the Forum Ken Leung CD Forum Support 6 29-01-2002 12:32
about how Drive Train push the robot... shouldn't the force accelerate the robot? Ken Leung Technical Discussion 12 26-11-2001 09:39


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 21:49.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi