|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Physics of antimatter
Of course I know what antimatter is and what it does. That's why I think that it would be an offensive part of the robot and therefore forbidden. Or they could try to power the 'bot with matter-amtimatter annihalations which would blast the whole US away (if they use macroscopic amounts).
That's why I thought that antimatter had another meaning than the normal physical one, but obviously it doesn't. And although there is no such thing antigravity, it would be really nice to have a device that causes it on the robot: No more weight limitations and a great robot speed... |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| How much planning goes into your robot? | Jnadke | General Forum | 41 | 29-01-2006 21:29 |
| serious problem found - robot controller resets when jarred! | KenWittlief | Electrical | 23 | 19-03-2003 13:30 |
| WASH Palm scouting at the Championship | Mike Soukup | Scouting | 2 | 19-04-2002 15:14 |
| Pneumatics pump allowed on robot? | bigqueue | Pneumatics | 5 | 06-01-2002 12:30 |
| about how Drive Train push the robot... shouldn't the force accelerate the robot? | Ken Leung | Technical Discussion | 12 | 26-11-2001 09:39 |