|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
| View Poll Results: Is FIRST being cheap?! | |||
| Yes |
|
17 | 16.35% |
| Never |
|
65 | 62.50% |
| Don't really care |
|
22 | 21.15% |
| Voters: 104. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
I have always admired FIRST and innovationFIRST but this year I have been greatly disappointed with what they have supplied this year. For the following reasons (mostly electronics)…
1) Why do they have female-female tether cables?! This only results in the clutter of cables while testing the robot. 2) Why have to tether in order to assign team numbers!? 3a) Why did they not have IR beacons and receivers pre-built?! I can see why they did it but they should have also shipped a built one. 3b) If you are going to give instructions on how to build circuits to hundreds of teams, MAKE sure they are right. 4) Why did they make all RC inputs PWM style and not supply us with spare cables for wiring the sensors... 5) FIRST.org has severely dropped in quality... just look at the Q&A section. And what happened to the Forum? 6) The final point is not aimed at FIRST but rather at ChiefDelphi users. People have been so caught up with their reputations and the idea that people should search before posting that this site has gone from a convenient place to ask question with the assurance that no one will curse at you for repeating a thread that had been posted in 2000 to a place where I rather avoid asking questions. NOTE: This post is not meant to offend people or degrade FIRST’s outstanding reputation but rather to address the changes that I have seen through the past 4 years which I have been involved in this great competition. |
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Is FIRST being cheap!?
duplicate accounts are against the rules.
141.150.xxx.xxx - - [19/Jan/2004:12:35:12 -0500] "GET /forums/login.php?do=logout 141.150.xxx.xxx - - [19/Jan/2004:17:35:17 +0000] "GET /forums/index.php? 141.150.xxx.xxx - - [19/Jan/2004:12:35:21 -0500] "GET /forums/register.php? |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Is FIRST being cheap!?
Quote:
As far as the original post goes, I'll just respond to these two points: Quote:
3b) Mistakes happen. Everyone screws up; you can't really hold this one against FIRST. I can't recall if they've corrected this one yet, but they will (hopefully) do it soon if they haven't. |
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Is FIRST being cheap!?
Quote:
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Is FIRST being cheap!?
Sometime around the end of last year I got very frustrated with the way FIRST does business. FIRST's inconsistencies and occasional incompetence had become a running joke among a few mentors. One mentor I know was almost ready to say "Screw it, lets do BattleBots" Fortunately I got a chance to speak to Dean Kamen briefly about this. He pointed out that FIRST has been growing tremendously over the past few years. Their staff is dedicated and talented, but very small. FIRST also relies on other people's generosity, and while their connections are extraordinary, they still face the same challenges as every other non-profit. Basically, as the number of teams grows by leaps and bounds FIRST has had some serious growing pains. Organizing the competition has become a tremendously complicated task and sometimes mistakes are made. Sometimes things have to be done cheap in order to get them done at all. If you're really frustrated with FIRST, talk to them. They do actually believe in what they say they believe in and they are doing tremendous work. Unfortunately, its an increasingly tough job and although they try very hard they aren't perfect. I know that sometimes its frustrating, but there's a reason we do FIRST - we believe deeply in the value of what they are trying to accomplish. FIRST is gradually changing the culture of the United States and they've brought us along for the ride. We just have to put up with a few screw-ups in order to get there.
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Is FIRST being cheap!?
searching the threads for the answer you are looking for is better for YOU:
A. if the answer is already there, you get it instantly, you dont have to wait for someone to read your thread, look up info... B. if the question has been discussed in detail it has probabally been answered correctly, you dont always get the right answer in the first response to a new thread C. the threads from last years have been closed - if you search for an answer, you should be able to tell quickly if the threads the search engine supplys are from this year, or previous years. D. its LESS WORK for you to type in one or two keywords and see what the search engine comes up with, than it is for you to type out your WHOLE question people chant "SEARCH SEARCH SEARCH" because its better for you its better for us its better for the environment :c) Last edited by KenWittlief : 19-01-2004 at 15:22. |
|
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Is FIRST being cheap!?
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Is FIRST being cheap!?
FIRST is so much more than building a robot, and I think small errors and problems do more to prepare you for the 'real world' than handing you a perfect kit of parts with all of the drawings complete and every possible question answered.
If you enter almost any field of engineering, you will quickly find that you will not get a complete set of requirements from your customer the first time around (if ever). You will not get all of the answers you want. You will make some assumptions and then later find out you were wrong. You will have to work to rules and restrictions that you do not understand or agree with. You will have rules that require you to interpret and make the right decision for you or your company. To me, all of these "problems" add to the value of FIRST. They make it real - because the real world of engineering is far from perfect. The only thing that FIRST could do to make this program even more realistic is to introduce a totally new restriction or rule change about week four - sort of like a new law or regulatory mandate that suddenly changes the way business has to operate because often these changes happen just that fast. |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Is FIRST being cheap!?
Quote:
![]() |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Is FIRST being cheap!?
Quote:
1) This is so people dont mess up and fry their oi/rc by connecting the wrong ports together, thus they made 2 ports need db9 female connectors. 2) SO around 1000 teams do not accidentally incorrectly input their team nuimbers on their bot and another team controlling it while at a comp, and so it cant acidentally be changed on te field. 3a)there are around 1000 teams, not all are going to use the IR Sensors so why should they have to build it if we wont use it. This item is like the current sensor and has to be done by hand to cut costs. 3b) FIRST is made up of under 100 people at FIRST Place, and depends heavily on volunteers (like many people here), and we are human. Everyone makes mistakes. Just like you made a mistake of using a false user name. |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Is FIRST being cheap!?
FIRST can be as cheap as they want, for all I care. I don't think it's that big of a deal if FIRST makes a few mistakes or cuts back every now and then. Personally, I'm just glad I have the opportunity to be in this program. If FIRST slips up, who are we to complain? We're only here because they dedicate their time and money to us.
|
|
#12
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Is FIRST being cheap!?
All of your questions have been answered by others, but I have to chime in and also say that FIRST is run by very few people. Those few people put so much work into preparing all of the items. I think for FIRST Lego League, the trophies are hand-built... with so many competitions I think they have a few people who do that as a job and assemble them (this is what I heard, I do not know if it's true), but even if it's not true... could you imagine the man-hours it would take to assemble that sensor and reciever?
One thing I would like to mention, if you feel FIRST is lacking in an area, offer to help out. I know Dez has done that and now works with scorekeeping, I helped write one of the autonomous manuals that will be up soon because last year many teams had problems and little documentation to back it up, and I mean... there is a VERY long list of people on this ChiefDelphi community who have thought to themselves "Wow, FIRST really didn't do a good job with such and such" but, instead of just complaining... they've jumped up and said "I can try to help a little bit, how can I help?" If you want to see a change in anything... don't expect others to do that, there's not enough workers at FIRST to do it all, you need to stand up and call them and say "What can I do?" That's the only way the program can improve, especially with the rapid growth of the program. |
|
#13
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Is FIRST being cheap!?
This year's electronics is the last thing I would be complaining about.
The inclusion of electrical connectors is a very pleasant return from the past, especially for rookie teams and other teams without vast resources. |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Is FIRST being cheap!?
I doubt we should actually be calling FIRST "Cheap"... As you know, FIRST has grown a lot over the last few years... From below 1000 to 1400 (?) So you must understand they must rush to get everything setup everything. Building the IR Beacons can allow students, who are not taking tech courses or courses that do not involve making a circuit board to make one... I know I've learned something in the last few days and learned how to make an IR beacon at least, it's a great opportunity to learn. So quit complaining that FIRST is cheap, cuz you all know that they are overstressed with paperwork and other stuff to pick out the tiny flaws that anyone could have overlooked.
|
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Is FIRST being cheap!?
we need to understand the difference between 'cheap' and 'profit'.
FIRST is a non-profit organization. That means they are not making ANY money off this program - there are not a bunch of FIRST stockholders somewhere screaming about profits and stock prices. FIRST has done an incredible job of keeping the registration prices down - you pay $5000 for your first regional and $4000 for each additional regional you attend, and the championship is only $4000. Since you only get one kit of parts, clearly it costs about $4000 per team to host a event, and the kit is being sold to you for approximately $1000. so do you want FIRST to go nuts and put all kinds of expensive stuff in the kit - even if your team is not going to use some of it - because the only way FIRST could do that would be to raise the price of the first regional fee - would you rather pay $6000 or $10,000 for your first regional, so you can have a box full of really expensive stuff? Last edited by KenWittlief : 20-01-2004 at 08:37. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Dirt Cheap edu Controller! | Sachiel7 | Robotics Education and Curriculum | 4 | 06-12-2004 20:39 |
| FOR SALE: Long serial cables Cheap!!! | sanddrag | General Forum | 10 | 06-11-2002 15:39 |
| Possible Configuration to keep things cheap | archiver | 1999 | 8 | 23-06-2002 23:03 |
| Cheap small gear source | archiver | 2000 | 2 | 23-06-2002 22:33 |
| Extremely cheap soccer balls | P.J. Baker | General Forum | 8 | 10-01-2002 20:48 |