|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
| View Poll Results: Were teams successful with a tank tread drive? | |||
| It worked all the time. |
|
18 | 43.90% |
| It was a nightmare. |
|
6 | 14.63% |
| It sometimes worked but always required constant maintenance. |
|
17 | 41.46% |
| Voters: 41. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Success with Tank Treads
618 went with treads last year and did well. While I do agree with the simplicity arguement against treads, who said life had to be simple!
![]() |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Success with Tank Treads
http://www.valleytech.k12.ma.us/robo...2%20Monday.jpg
We have been doing tracks for 10 years now. The most important thing is you power train. if you get your power just right the tracks work great. We found out how much power a track can take. What we did was speed up the track which lowers the power. This way the robots is fast and still have great pushing and pulling power. with out ripping the tracks Tracks are very costly but done right is very easy to drive under auto mode and very easy for the driver to control. Last thing you need to keep your center of gravity as low as you can. this also helps out the tracks |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| tank treads vs. threaded wheels | lj8758 | Technical Discussion | 14 | 24-01-2003 00:30 |
| Under or Over? To tank or Not to tank that tis the question! | archiver | 2001 | 2 | 23-06-2002 22:53 |
| TANK TREADS...welp. | archiver | 2001 | 13 | 23-06-2002 22:50 |
| pneumatics tank | archiver | 2000 | 2 | 23-06-2002 22:43 |
| What problems have you encountered using treads? | M.I. | Technical Discussion | 8 | 15-01-2002 22:13 |