|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
| View Poll Results: What motors do you use for the drive train? | |||
| CIM Motors |
|
48 | 60.00% |
| Globe Motors |
|
6 | 7.50% |
| Fisher Price Motors |
|
10 | 12.50% |
| Drill Motors |
|
59 | 73.75% |
| Other |
|
6 | 7.50% |
| Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 80. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: What motors do you use to drive your robot?
You might want to add Drills+CIM's.
As for your question, either one will prove to be fine. The Drills have a bit more power than the CIM's. They can be shifted using their transmission if you wish, and you already have the mounts and gearboxes if you dont want to make a chain and sprocket drive. People have voiced concerns with the integrity of the transmissions, but if you do it right, there wont be any problems. Also, the drills wont backdrive in their standard configuration, which may or may not be an advantage. As to the CIM's, they are very easy to mount using the holes on the face. (10-24, I believe?) They still have a good amount of power, they don't overheat as often as the drills. They don't have an anti backdrive feature like the drills. They are also a bit heftier than the drills. One plus is that they spin at approximately the same speed forward and backward, unlike the drills, meaning that your robot wont drift to one side constantly. Cory |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Shifting Gears | MBosompra | Technical Discussion | 71 | 23-07-2004 02:49 |
| Looking for practice motors & extra tape drive parts? | archiver | 2000 | 1 | 23-06-2002 22:54 |
| WASH Palm scouting at the Championship | Mike Soukup | Scouting | 2 | 19-04-2002 15:14 |
| "Motors and Drive train edition" of Fresh From the Forum | Ken Leung | CD Forum Support | 6 | 29-01-2002 12:32 |
| about how Drive Train push the robot... shouldn't the force accelerate the robot? | Ken Leung | Technical Discussion | 12 | 26-11-2001 09:39 |