|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Can someone post this on FIRST q/a
Good question, as it never made sense that a 50 amp connector would be used when our circuit breaker is 120 amps. I'll include the obligatory link to 190's melted connector.
However, the SB120 is very large and heavy (it's about twice the size of the current FIRST conector, the SB50). You might want to go for something in between, such as the SBO or the SBE80. |
|
#2
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: Can someone post this on FIRST q/a
Quote:
|
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Can someone post this on FIRST q/a
Guys,
It wil be interesting how First responds to this question. The rules are not really clear in that they recommend the supplied connector as a minimum but indicate if you use something else you may not be compatible with other team's connectors. We use a Tyco/Amp connector that is available from Newark. It is designed for 100 amps, works well with #6 wire and looks like a larger version of the Anderson power pole connectors. We have used these for several years now. Remember to add mating connectors to your battery charger. |
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Can someone post this on FIRST q/a
Quote:
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Can someone post this on FIRST q/a
Quote:
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Can someone post this on FIRST q/a
When we read the rules, we never got the idea that other connectors of different ratings were permitted. So, we were thinking of using two in parallel, mounting them in such a way that they would act as one unit.
If this would be allowed, it would be a great help. |
|
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Can someone post this on FIRST q/a
Quote:
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Can someone post this on FIRST q/a
That would ensure compatibility with other team's batteries too. Good Idea!
![]() |
|
#9
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: Can someone post this on FIRST q/a
Well, FIRST answered no on the different battery connectors issue. The full response:
Quote:
Venkatesh, you should probably ask about your method. |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Can someone post this on FIRST q/a
Quote:
|
|
#11
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Can someone post this on FIRST q/a
This is a vast difference in policy from previous years. The rules specify "a" quick connect not "the" quick connect. Standby for further info.
We currently have 8-10 batteries, several chargers, four past year's robots and a prototype and robot from this year all wired for a different connector. |
|
#12
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
New connector rule
Al --
Please read the whole rule. The intent is that the connector provided in the kit is the connector that must be used. This is not an error. "<R20> The 12v battery must be wired directly to a quick connect / disconnect connector (provided in the kit)" As you can see, the rule clearly states that the connector is provided in the kit. The reason that the word "a" was used, is that there are two of the connectors provided (the entire connector is made up of two mirror-image halves). Sorry to hear that all your previous equipment uses a different connector - but for 2004 the rule has changed. ![]() Aidan |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: New connector rule
Quote:
Rules like this would be a lot easier to accept if there was at least an attempt made at providing a reason. Additionally, I read the passage from the manual that you quoted as "You need to use a quick disconnect, and there happens to be one provided in the kit." I don't read it as implying that it's required to use the one in the kit, but apparently that's what it meant. |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Can someone post this on FIRST q/a
Could someone post a question related to my method on FIRST's Q&A? I won't have the ability to post that question for some time.
|
|
#15
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: New connector rule
Quote:
I must disagree. The wording is not very clear but implying that the word "a" is meant to identify one half of a connector is a stretch. The phrase in parenthesis implies a suitable connector is included other wise it would read without parents. Although the wording of this rule has changed from last year, it's implication for veteran teams is that equivalent or better substitutes are allowable. I know that I read in the Q&A recently, a similar question was answered that FIRST recommended using the supplied connector and if a team used something different they risked incompatability with other teams should the need to share batteries arise. That question appears to have been removed from the Q&A as I was not able to find it this afternoon. Realistically, today's answer seems oddly worded in that the question seemed related to the connectors popping apart not replacing a kit part with something better. I agree and it has been my stated opinion that the Anderson Power Products connectors work fine for most teams. There are teams that draw excessive amounts of current during match play that would result in heating, and fire using the 50 amp connector. A rule of thumb is any team that uses most or all of the motors including both drills combined with both Chips and/or both FP's will draw more current than the supplied connector can handle. You and I both know that the stall current on any one of these motors is over 100 amps. Last edited by Al Skierkiewicz : 12-02-2004 at 18:11. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| ChiefDelphi Forums Community Bulletin | Brandon Martus | CD Forum Support | 0 | 30-03-2003 23:00 |
| ChiefDelphi Forums Community Bulletin | Brandon Martus | CD Forum Support | 0 | 12-01-2003 22:19 |
| ChiefDelphi Forums Community Bulletin | Brandon Martus | CD Forum Support | 0 | 05-01-2003 22:04 |
| ChiefDelphi Forums Community Bulletin | Brandon Martus | CD Forum Support | 0 | 05-05-2002 22:07 |
| ChiefDelphi Forums Community Bulletin | Brandon Martus | CD Forum Support | 0 | 04-02-2002 00:39 |