|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Legality of reaching over
Are human players allowed to put their hands over the drivers station to drop a ball, say if the mobile goal is right up against the station. Today at the scrimmage it was really had to throw them over without my hand going over and im wondering if FIRST would allow this.
|
|
#2
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: Legality of reaching over
I can't find this referenced in the rules this year, but, in the past, reaching over the top has resulted in a DQ.
|
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Legality of reaching over
Human player from 521 said i should ask a ref at the comp b4 the match. Or if one would post here
![]() |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Legality of reaching over
I would say it would be the same as reaching outside the ball corral. Remember there are tall robots this year and the plexiglass is only 7 feet tall. Pinched fingers. Ouch.. In the matter of safety I would say "Please keep all hands and feet within the player stations at all time. They did say you could dqed for leaving the player area. And your arms are part of yourself. At least I want to keep it that way.
|
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Legality of reaching over
thanx a bunch for your quick responces
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Legality of reaching over
Take a look at G09.
Quote:
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Legality of reaching over
from what i understand your fingertips can not go past the plexiglass over the top of it =D
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Legality of reaching over
Quote:
EDIT Also, if the robot breaks that plane going the other way, you can't come into contact with it whatsoever (it's one of the safty rules), and I'm pretty sure that superceeds the previous ruling. <G28> was the closest rule I could find, and it does mention specifically breaking that plane (even though it only specifically mentions the ball corral). Technically, since a plane is infinite, that'd include going over the plexiglass. And it's a safety concern anyway, so I'd imagine the refs will take it that way. /EDIT Last edited by EddieMcD : 23-02-2004 at 17:59. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Legality of controlling 2 cylinders with 1 solenoid | mtangolics | Pneumatics | 4 | 19-02-2004 21:29 |
| Legality of Spring Loaded Pistons | Yan Wang | Pneumatics | 13 | 19-02-2004 17:20 |
| Legality of Blocking Ball Chutes | Aignam | Rules/Strategy | 29 | 12-01-2004 14:32 |
| legality question | rbayer | General Forum | 8 | 15-09-2002 00:25 |
| Legality of steel tubing. | newy | Rules/Strategy | 3 | 01-02-2002 09:16 |