Mobile Goals

[George1902]

Originally Posted by Kevin Sevcik

they can be turned any which way, and won't necessarily always have a point or flat facing a robot.

We always had a point facing our robot. I think the randomness refers to the eight PVC poles, not the six sides of the base.

[ngreen]

Originally Posted by George1083

We always had a point facing our robot. I think the randomness refers to the eight PVC poles, not the six sides of the base.

No, the randomness does refer to the six sides. They will either place it with a point or flat side against the platform. Some matches one would be flat and the other would be point.

I don't like this update at all. I'd prefer they just stick to placing a point against the platform. It is easy and super accurate. That is why I thought they have the tape line there. At St. Louis there was at least one team that had cool autonomous modes that grabbed the mobile goal and such before they started using this update. With difference orientation I didn't see anyone attempt this. I think they should stick with the orientation that was printed into all the regional booklets.

[10intheCrunch]

Hmmm...from what I understood, what the randomness referred to was the orientation of the caster wheels, ie *which* side was flush up against the wall. I am pretty sure that in every match it is supposed to be flush, but I suppose I'll have to wait a few more days till Sacramento to find out (this could really mess up my autonomous!).

[ngreen]

Nope, sorry. Randomness meant the complete orientation of the goals, at least at St. Louis. Sometime the goal would be flush against the platform while other time only the point would be touching the platform. And it's random. I don't like how they are doing this because it really makes it hard and confusing for programmers. It isn't quite as fun to watch robots set dead for 15 seconds.

[Rich Wong]

Originally Posted by ngreen

Nope, sorry. Randomness meant the complete orientation of the goals, at least at St. Louis. Sometime the goal would be flush against the platform while other time only the point would be touching the platform. And it's random. I don't like how they are doing this because it really makes it hard and confusing for programmers. It isn't quite as fun to watch robots set dead for 15 seconds.

At St. Louis, it sounds incorrect.