|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Team #93's robot finished.
Quote:
Oh and to answer another question on a previous thread about our bot. We catch both our own and the opponents sides. Look for clips from St. Louis soon. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Team #93's robot finished.
according to Simple strategy sheet,
this bot is a: 2-2 effective counter strategy (recommended): (3,4,6)-1 |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Team #93's robot finished.
Quote:
![]() |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Team #93's robot finished.
thanks for the correction!
I'm not recording these on my sheet until I actually sit and watch some matches, but once in a while I'll hazard a guess as to what a robot is capable of, and what can be done to counter it. When I think about strategy, I always use our bot as a guide to measure up to, so that's why I hesitated on adding more numbers. One thing I forgot to put in the general version (and use in this thread) of the sheet is Bolding and italicizing. bold= can do very well italics= poor (to make full use of this, make sure to use your bot as the standard, so bold=more effective/reliable, ital=less effective/reliable... makes for easier gameplanning) Another thing I've noticed this year is that there seems to be a lot more torque than last year... as unlikely as that may sound (at least at the BAE NH regional) |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| pic: Team 311's Robot ("The Claw") | CD47-Bot | Robot Showcase | 2 | 26-02-2004 19:15 |
| pic: Team 968's robot revealed! V2: details!! | CD47-Bot | Robot Showcase | 1 | 26-02-2004 19:06 |
| pic: Team #93's robot "Tobor 7" Teaser | CD47-Bot | Robot Showcase | 45 | 23-02-2004 16:03 |
| The 2003 Index of team's post about their robot... | Ken Leung | Robot Showcase | 4 | 28-02-2003 00:18 |
| More 'Best' Robots (a well thought list) | archiver | 2000 | 2 | 23-06-2002 23:11 |