Go to Post I would not want the task of devising a system that 50,000 very smart people try to outwit. - texarkana [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Competition > Rules/Strategy
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
 
 
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 3 votes, 5.00 average. Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #26   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 17-03-2004, 23:13
jimfortytwo jimfortytwo is offline
Registered User
AKA: Jim Paulos
#0418 (Purple Haze)
Team Role: Student
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: austin
Posts: 65
jimfortytwo is just really nicejimfortytwo is just really nicejimfortytwo is just really nicejimfortytwo is just really nicejimfortytwo is just really nice
Send a message via ICQ to jimfortytwo Send a message via AIM to jimfortytwo Send a message via Yahoo to jimfortytwo
Re: "Spare Parts" Rules Are Broken

Ken's observation represents a literal reading of what the black and white says. The counterpoint relies on an interpretation of those rules to expland their meaning, primarily based on previous year's experience (what has been dubed "common sense"). If we read and write the rules so that the newcomer may take them literally and understand whats going on-- thats fine. If we read and write the rules and ensure everyone understands that a great weight of old-time momentum, past precidence, and unwritten rules apply-- that could be fine too. The transition, however, is killing us.

I understand how difficult it is to write bulletproof rules, and particularly how impossible the feat is on the fly. However, this "commen sense" only can exist in the minds of those who have already played the game. And if KenWittlief and dlavery can't agree on what the rules say, who knows which interpretation a rookie team is going to run with?

More ink has been spilt this year arguing over what "common sense" is than was in the rule book to begin with. Lawyers don't argue over whats written in black and white -- they argue over whats written in grey.

Anyways. My team won't be partying at midnight in the parking lot over by team XXX's mobile machine shop, but if someone else was I wouldn't be able to hold it against them until after someone warns them what we've decided the rule means.


EDIT: While I was typing this WebWader125 probably expressed my sentiments in a more gentile manner.

Theres another competition I do where every year a three page "uP policy paper" has to get passed around to explain rules that used to be in the book, but now veterans all just take for granted. Everyone sort of understands that this document is a ton of work for the one crusader who publishes it, and is a result of holes and ommisions in the existing rules... but one no wants the event rules themselves to break 2 pages (it wouldn't be pretty in the competition manual anymore.)

I'm sure everyone will survive the season, reguarless of whether or not team XXX needs a friendly tap on the shoulder to remind them to wrap it up at 7:00.

Last edited by jimfortytwo : 17-03-2004 at 23:24.
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Uniform rules and enforcers? Ben Mitchell General Forum 31 12-01-2005 20:55
Tapping broken taps (a.k.a. I'm all tapped out) dlavery Technical Discussion 28 26-06-2004 22:56
Dilemma - Letter of the rules v. spirit of the rules Natchez General Forum 27 03-04-2003 15:37
Time for new rules! archiver 2001 11 24-06-2002 02:01
Robot electrical systems rules Morgan Jones Rules/Strategy 5 06-01-2002 00:50


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:57.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi