|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Top 10 Scoring Averages "over 80" by Robot
Quote:
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Top 10 Scoring Averages "over 80" by Robot
anyone have the official avg. including the finals for Team 138?
I'm missing the scores to a couple matches, but if they are not low-scoring ones, it would put our complete avg at 97 points just looking for official confirmation on this one |
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Top 10 Scoring Averages "over 80" by Robot
Quote:
|
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Top 10 Scoring Averages "over 80" by Robot
Quote:
|
|
#5
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: Top 10 Scoring Averages "over 80" by Robot
I'd be even more interested to see these in relation to the regionals average score. For example, 501's average is 49 points above the NH average and is a lot more impressive then 236 being "only" 27 points above the NE average. I think 501 deserves a triple yikes
![]() Edit: I'm not on 1403, you misread the last digit We (1405) only averaged 60 something at Chesapeake. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Top 10 Scoring Averages "over 80" by Robot
hmm
521 scores (110, 30 ,135, 30, 75, 75, 90, 100, 100) gives us an 82.777 <-- all the sevens are lucky ! heh numbers are fun 6.30 * 82.7 = 521 if you use significant figures ... lalala i have no home work ... ohh im bored |
|
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Top 10 Scoring Averages "over 80" by Robot
Oops....
Before I get crucified by all you stats experts out there, I had an error in my Excel spreadsheet ("measure twice, cut once" applies here too!). So I need to REVISE THE LIST (Upward!) 105 Points Average (double yikes!) - Team 501 (New Hampshire) 99 Points - Team 236 (New England) 98 Points - Team 254 (Sacramento) 96 Points - Team 222 (Chesapeake), Team 311 (Long Island) 95 Points - Team 753 (Sacramento) 94 Points - Team 650 (St. Louis) 91 Points - Team 69 (New Hampshire) 88 Points - Teams 1114 (Long Island), 945 (Florida), 233 (Florida) 87 Points - Team 571 (New England) 84 Points - Teams 237 (New Jersey), 219 (New Jersey) 83 Points - Team 131 (New Hampshire), 521 (New Hampshire) 81 Points - Team 181 (New England) 80 Points - Team 616 (Virginia) I'm sure there are robots I've missed - particularly those hovering around the 80 points level (I’ll try to keep up with those that post responses)....In the future, I'll probably just keep a list of the top 10 average scores. The cutoff for that right now appears to be at 88 – so if you think you’re above 88 right now, then let me know. I'm sure that score will only increase in the next couple of weeks as experience pays dividends. |
|
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Top 10 Scoring Averages "over 80" by Robot
Quote:
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Top 10 Scoring Averages "over 80" by Robot
Team 61 at Fl regional
Our match score were 120,90,60,10,90,130,125,120,85,65= 89.5 ave If you drop the low score we would have a ave of 98.3333 |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Top 10 Scoring Averages "over 80" by Robot
If you do the finals
Team 61 had Q=135,S=180,F=120 = 145 ave |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Top 10 Scoring Averages "over 80" by Robot
RAGE team 173 had an average of 92 over our 9 Qualifying matches at UTC NE.
Our average in the finals at UTC was 165 for the matches we played in. |
|
#12
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Top 10 Scoring Averages "over 80" by Robot
Okay, okay…..I missed some good (I mean GREAT!) average scores. We have now evaluated ALL Team scores from ALL Regional Events completed through March 20th. Only qualifying match scores were evaluated. Since this year’s game is called “Raising the Bar”, I’ve raised the “cut” to 90 points average or greater (Sorry Team 1114 GM Simbotics, your 88 doesn’t cut it any more – better pull up your socks at the Canadian Regional next week). I’ll update this list again after the March 25-27 Regional Events data is available…..
Since these are all terrific scores, I’ll say “Yikes!” to all listed: 109 Points Average - Team 175 (New England) 108 Points - Team 121 (New England) 105 Points - Teams 501 (New Hampshire), Team 126 (New England) 104 Points - Team 1403 (Chesapeake) 102 Points – Team 237 (New England) 100 Points - Team 945 (Sacramento) 99 Points - Team 236 (New England) 98 Points - Team 254 Sacramento) 96 Points - Teams 222 (Chesapeake), 157 (New England), 311 (Long Island) 95 Points - Team 753 (Sacramento) 94 Points - Team 650 (St. Louis), 494 (Peachtree) 92 Points - Teams 311 (Florida), 173 (New England) 91 Points - Teams 279 (Gr. Lakes), 69 (New Hamp.), 473 (Oregon), 178 (New Eng) 90 Points - Teams 176 (New Hampshire), 61 (Florida), 569 (Long Island) |
|
#13
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Top 10 Scoring Averages "over 80" by Robot
Team scoring averages (using Qualifying Match data only) updated through the six Regional Events held March 25-27.
There is definitely evidence of “Raising the Bar” in terms of scoring averages this past weekend. There are now over 40 Teams with Q/match averages of 90 or greater! (Is no one playing defense???) Congratulations (yikes!) to all! 131 Points Average – Team 56 (Philly) 122 Points – Team 222 (Philly) 117 Points – Team 486 (Philly) 112 Points – Teams 272 (Philly), Team 69 (Southern Cal.) 111 Points – Team 292 (Midwest) 109 Points Average - Team 175 (New England) 108 Points - Team 121 (New England), 269 (Midwest) 105 Points - Teams 501 (New Hampshire), Team 126 (New England) 104 Points - Teams 1403 (Chesapeake), 27 (Midwest) 102 Points – Team 237 (New England) 101 Points – Teams 525 (Midwest), 45 (Midwest) 100 Points - Teams 945 (Sacramento), 383 (Midwest) 99 Points - Team 236 (New England) 98 Points - Teams 254 Sacramento), 60 (Colorado) (Isn’t this ironic?!?!) 97 Points – Teams 67 (Buckeye), 1391 (Philly) 96 Points - Teams 222 (Ches.), 157 (New Eng.), 311 (Long Is.), 111 (Midwest) 95 Points - Teams 753 (Sacramento), 224 (Philly) 94 Points - Teams 650 (St. L), 494 (Peach), 381 (Phil), 484 (Phil), 980 (SoCal), 233 (NYC) 93 Points – Team 1218 (Philly) 92 Points - Teams 311 (Florida), 173 (New England) 91 Points - Teams 279 (Gr Lks), 69 (New Ham.), 473 (Or), 178 (New Eng), 522 (NYC), 81 (Midwest) 90 Points - Teams 176 (New Hamp), 61 (Florida), 569 (Long Island), 93 (Midwest) |
|
#14
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: Top 10 Scoring Averages "over 80" by Robot
Quote:
Check out the average score in the finals for the 340-67-1126 alliance at Buckeye. It is 167 points. Wow! Andy B. |
|
#15
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Top 10 Scoring Averages "over 80" by Robot
Quote:
You are correct on that one. I generated much of the data that Steve has been using to provide these scoring updates. I copied the results from the FIRST webpage into an Excel spreadsheet. From there I generated a pivot table which tabulated the pertinent data. Unfortunately, the pivot table treated the top row of raw data as a header, and did not include it in its calculations. Hence, any team who was the first team listed in the first match of a regional, had their average calculated without their first score. Sorry about the error, and the excessively boring explanation... ![]() Last edited by Karthik : 29-03-2004 at 14:19. Reason: Missed a word... |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Scoring and Defense. | archiver | 1999 | 10 | 23-06-2002 22:44 |
| Top Secret Picture of BORG robot | archiver | 2000 | 2 | 23-06-2002 21:57 |
| WASH Palm scouting at the Championship | Mike Soukup | Scouting | 2 | 19-04-2002 15:14 |
| Index of team's post about their robot... | Ken Leung | Robot Showcase | 1 | 20-03-2002 17:10 |
| about how Drive Train push the robot... shouldn't the force accelerate the robot? | Ken Leung | Technical Discussion | 12 | 26-11-2001 09:39 |