|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Top 10 Scoring Averages "over 80" by Robot
Oops....
Before I get crucified by all you stats experts out there, I had an error in my Excel spreadsheet ("measure twice, cut once" applies here too!). So I need to REVISE THE LIST (Upward!) 105 Points Average (double yikes!) - Team 501 (New Hampshire) 99 Points - Team 236 (New England) 98 Points - Team 254 (Sacramento) 96 Points - Team 222 (Chesapeake), Team 311 (Long Island) 95 Points - Team 753 (Sacramento) 94 Points - Team 650 (St. Louis) 91 Points - Team 69 (New Hampshire) 88 Points - Teams 1114 (Long Island), 945 (Florida), 233 (Florida) 87 Points - Team 571 (New England) 84 Points - Teams 237 (New Jersey), 219 (New Jersey) 83 Points - Team 131 (New Hampshire), 521 (New Hampshire) 81 Points - Team 181 (New England) 80 Points - Team 616 (Virginia) I'm sure there are robots I've missed - particularly those hovering around the 80 points level (I’ll try to keep up with those that post responses)....In the future, I'll probably just keep a list of the top 10 average scores. The cutoff for that right now appears to be at 88 – so if you think you’re above 88 right now, then let me know. I'm sure that score will only increase in the next couple of weeks as experience pays dividends. |
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Top 10 Scoring Averages "over 80" by Robot
Quote:
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Top 10 Scoring Averages "over 80" by Robot
Team 61 at Fl regional
Our match score were 120,90,60,10,90,130,125,120,85,65= 89.5 ave If you drop the low score we would have a ave of 98.3333 |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Top 10 Scoring Averages "over 80" by Robot
If you do the finals
Team 61 had Q=135,S=180,F=120 = 145 ave |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Top 10 Scoring Averages "over 80" by Robot
RAGE team 173 had an average of 92 over our 9 Qualifying matches at UTC NE.
Our average in the finals at UTC was 165 for the matches we played in. |
|
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Top 10 Scoring Averages "over 80" by Robot
Okay, okay…..I missed some good (I mean GREAT!) average scores. We have now evaluated ALL Team scores from ALL Regional Events completed through March 20th. Only qualifying match scores were evaluated. Since this year’s game is called “Raising the Bar”, I’ve raised the “cut” to 90 points average or greater (Sorry Team 1114 GM Simbotics, your 88 doesn’t cut it any more – better pull up your socks at the Canadian Regional next week). I’ll update this list again after the March 25-27 Regional Events data is available…..
Since these are all terrific scores, I’ll say “Yikes!” to all listed: 109 Points Average - Team 175 (New England) 108 Points - Team 121 (New England) 105 Points - Teams 501 (New Hampshire), Team 126 (New England) 104 Points - Team 1403 (Chesapeake) 102 Points – Team 237 (New England) 100 Points - Team 945 (Sacramento) 99 Points - Team 236 (New England) 98 Points - Team 254 Sacramento) 96 Points - Teams 222 (Chesapeake), 157 (New England), 311 (Long Island) 95 Points - Team 753 (Sacramento) 94 Points - Team 650 (St. Louis), 494 (Peachtree) 92 Points - Teams 311 (Florida), 173 (New England) 91 Points - Teams 279 (Gr. Lakes), 69 (New Hamp.), 473 (Oregon), 178 (New Eng) 90 Points - Teams 176 (New Hampshire), 61 (Florida), 569 (Long Island) |
|
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Top 10 Scoring Averages "over 80" by Robot
Team scoring averages (using Qualifying Match data only) updated through the six Regional Events held March 25-27.
There is definitely evidence of “Raising the Bar” in terms of scoring averages this past weekend. There are now over 40 Teams with Q/match averages of 90 or greater! (Is no one playing defense???) Congratulations (yikes!) to all! 131 Points Average – Team 56 (Philly) 122 Points – Team 222 (Philly) 117 Points – Team 486 (Philly) 112 Points – Teams 272 (Philly), Team 69 (Southern Cal.) 111 Points – Team 292 (Midwest) 109 Points Average - Team 175 (New England) 108 Points - Team 121 (New England), 269 (Midwest) 105 Points - Teams 501 (New Hampshire), Team 126 (New England) 104 Points - Teams 1403 (Chesapeake), 27 (Midwest) 102 Points – Team 237 (New England) 101 Points – Teams 525 (Midwest), 45 (Midwest) 100 Points - Teams 945 (Sacramento), 383 (Midwest) 99 Points - Team 236 (New England) 98 Points - Teams 254 Sacramento), 60 (Colorado) (Isn’t this ironic?!?!) 97 Points – Teams 67 (Buckeye), 1391 (Philly) 96 Points - Teams 222 (Ches.), 157 (New Eng.), 311 (Long Is.), 111 (Midwest) 95 Points - Teams 753 (Sacramento), 224 (Philly) 94 Points - Teams 650 (St. L), 494 (Peach), 381 (Phil), 484 (Phil), 980 (SoCal), 233 (NYC) 93 Points – Team 1218 (Philly) 92 Points - Teams 311 (Florida), 173 (New England) 91 Points - Teams 279 (Gr Lks), 69 (New Ham.), 473 (Or), 178 (New Eng), 522 (NYC), 81 (Midwest) 90 Points - Teams 176 (New Hamp), 61 (Florida), 569 (Long Island), 93 (Midwest) |
|
#8
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: Top 10 Scoring Averages "over 80" by Robot
Quote:
Check out the average score in the finals for the 340-67-1126 alliance at Buckeye. It is 167 points. Wow! Andy B. |
|
#9
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Top 10 Scoring Averages "over 80" by Robot
Quote:
You are correct on that one. I generated much of the data that Steve has been using to provide these scoring updates. I copied the results from the FIRST webpage into an Excel spreadsheet. From there I generated a pivot table which tabulated the pertinent data. Unfortunately, the pivot table treated the top row of raw data as a header, and did not include it in its calculations. Hence, any team who was the first team listed in the first match of a regional, had their average calculated without their first score. Sorry about the error, and the excessively boring explanation... ![]() Last edited by Karthik : 29-03-2004 at 14:19. Reason: Missed a word... |
|
#10
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Top 10 Scoring Averages "over 80" by Robot
Our average alliance score is 108.69 (This is taken from Qualification rounds only)
Our average alliance score is 118.08 (This is taken from Elimination rounds only) Our average alliance score is 113.39 (This is taken from both Elimination rounds and Qualification rounds) This total includes both the Chesapeake and Philadelphia Regionals. All in all we played 16 Qualification rounds. Combined we played a total of 29 matches. Our highest match score is 170 to 90. This was with team 1113 and against 272 and 1370. 272 was undefeated at the time. Our highest Elimination score is 185 to 90. Our win loss record for Qualification rounds is 14/2 Overall our win loss record is 23/6 |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Top 10 Scoring Averages "over 80" by Robot
Quote:
|
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Top 10 Scoring Averages "over 80" by Robot
Quote:
You are right !!! 94 not 97 |
|
#13
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Top 10 Scoring Averages "over 80" by Robot
This is a list for a team's performance at one regional (showing up twice possibly). What about a list that shows a team's average for all regionals attended?
|
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Top 10 Scoring Averages "over 80" by Robot
Could you possibly make a list of the highest average score from each regional? The Philly regional had high average scores and VCU had low - just trying to see if Philly just had good teams or that the first regionals had lower scores.
|
|
#15
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Top 10 Scoring Averages "over 80" by Robot
Team 1126 Rochester, New York SparX
have a average of 120 with 13 matches. heres the scores Buckeye Regional Champs with 340 G.R.R. and 67 H.O.T. Just Q matches we have a average of 80 140 100 50 75 10 125 60 185<- Qf1.1 start of elim. 140 140 220 200 115 Last edited by Alex Cormier : 01-04-2004 at 19:02. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Scoring and Defense. | archiver | 1999 | 10 | 23-06-2002 22:44 |
| Top Secret Picture of BORG robot | archiver | 2000 | 2 | 23-06-2002 21:57 |
| WASH Palm scouting at the Championship | Mike Soukup | Scouting | 2 | 19-04-2002 15:14 |
| Index of team's post about their robot... | Ken Leung | Robot Showcase | 1 | 20-03-2002 17:10 |
| about how Drive Train push the robot... shouldn't the force accelerate the robot? | Ken Leung | Technical Discussion | 12 | 26-11-2001 09:39 |