|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2 truck drive train
Ah yes, one wheel per truck would cause castors to be used during all movements. Good point.
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2 truck drive train
now for the real brain-burner:
How to reduce sideways friction on your wheels? (This allows the usage of really fat, high-traction tires with your superior steering system!) in order to do this, however, the truck idea will not work. why? because if the outer radius is bigger than the inner radius, the wheels have to be at a different curve, no? there are a few solutions, but I will give you guys the first one 138 used to get you guys thinking in terms of circles ||...........|| ..\______/ ................where ||= the wheel assemblies, and ............................. ___ and \, / = aluminum barstock. ...______ ../..........\ ||...........|| ...just pretend the periods don't exist... CD automatically deletes the spaces i had so now- each of the center bars must move along the same, or initial plane, so they must have a sliding pivot point in the center of each bar. This is what car companies use for the front wheels of their creations. at each angle, there must be enough slack, or universal ball joints to allow the pivoting of the wheel assemblies. How to move these simple assemblies I leave to you all to figure out ![]() as I said, if you wish to see a more efficient design, check out Team 138 in the Pits and ask someone about the steering system. They will give you a packet if you are lucky, and it will describe Ackerman steering, and you can see for yourself how we acheive this.... just one thing: DO NOT TAKE PICTURES. DO NOT MAKE SKETCHES. we are very proud and protective of our designs.. but we will not be unkind to you ![]() Last edited by RoteAugen : 26-03-2004 at 21:55. Reason: the periods dont exist... shhh! |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2 truck drive train
The design posted here calls for a differential. A differential solves exactly the problem you describe. I suggest reading about it on howstuffworks.com or something, but essentially, it will allow one wheel in a truck to spin faster than the other, and therefore drive over a different radius. [edit] heres a relavent page http://auto.howstuffworks.com/differential1.htm[/edit] In fact, this is what car companies use to let cars turn.
advanced traction systems use these, but if im not msitaken, they are even more complicated because they allow forcing more power to one output shaft or the other, not just letting them balance out. [more_edit] howstuffworks.com is great, keep reading in that article, they explain this, too. Check out the viscous coupling. I'd like to see some team implement that [/more_edit]Last edited by Max Lobovsky : 26-03-2004 at 22:03. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| White Paper Discuss: Drive Train Basics | CD47-Bot | Extra Discussion | 6 | 06-09-2012 11:42 |
| Image Discuss: Transmissions and Drive Train | CD47-Bot | Extra Discussion | 16 | 17-02-2003 22:11 |
| what's your most important drive train advice? | Ken Leung | Technical Discussion | 42 | 07-01-2003 09:58 |
| Another chapter in the drive train story | AdamT | Technical Discussion | 19 | 29-09-2002 13:52 |
| Blowing fuses/tuning drive train | DougHogg | Motors | 10 | 23-06-2002 00:24 |