|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: "Spare Parts" Rules Are Broken
After some consideration, a ski trip, and the Lone Star Regional, I think I'm ready to dive back in....
Quote:
The point I was trying to make is not that teams are breaking the rules (which we can't do much about), but that the rules are structured so as to be meaningless (they are, as the title of the thread says, broken). What is the difference between having a spare robot in the arena and having it in the back of a truck in a parking lot? How does it make sense that one would be legal and the other illegal? Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
In order to accomplish that, we need to limit (in the rules) what can be brought to the competition to raw materials and OTS parts. Everything else either comes in the crate or stays at home. /An edit - excerpts from codes of ethics The IEEE code of ethics includes: [We agree] to avoid real or perceived conflicts of interest whenever possible... The NSPE code of ethics includes: Engineers shall disclose all known or potential conflicts of interest that could influence or appear to influence their judgment or the quality of their services. Last edited by Kris Verdeyen : 06-04-2004 at 19:36. Reason: clarity |
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: "Spare Parts" Rules Are Broken
Quote:
At Buckeye, our team had a chain-driven drive train consisting of 45 tooth plastic sprockets. We couldn't use the steel ones we had because they were about 8 pounds heavier. But the plastic sprockets kept braking. we ran out, and ended up using the steel ones. We had 1 match before the inspectors weighed us. 5 pounds over weight. We ended up taking of the compressor to make weight. This about crippled our arm, the height/angle was powered by pnuematics! |
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: "Spare Parts" Rules Are Broken
Quote:
If you didn't have the weight to put the steel sprockets on, you should have taken something else off. Weight is the ultimate bogey. It really sucks that you had to use plastic sprockets, but there is no way I'm going to feel sorry that you had to dump your compressor. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: "Spare Parts" Rules Are Broken
Speed holes, man
![]() |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: "Spare Parts" Rules Are Broken
Quote:
|
|
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: "Spare Parts" Rules Are Broken
Quote:
By the way, we had to remove our compressor, too. It sure is harder, but we get by. Quote:
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: "Spare Parts" Rules Are Broken
Quote:
|
|
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: "Spare Parts" Rules Are Broken
You haven't seen the bot.
The frame is fiberglass (we work in a wood shop). And we barely had time to change the sprockets, much less swiss-cheese them. but just about everything else was. We fixed that at West MI. By the way: the arm was it. No bin, no opening side flaps, nothing. We just put a valve on the tank and plugged it in until the match. I'm not saying that we have a disregard for the rules. Our original bot was in weight, but we ran out of sprockets. We made every effort to remain in the rules, however the circumstances were out of our control at that point. Maybe unfairly, you'll say not. We tried our best, but aparently that was not enough. Maybe you have no heart, maybe you're arrogant, and maybe your right. Maybe some of all 3. In any case, I'm not caring what you say. Maybe we should have forfeited the next match and swiss-cheesed them. I DON'T CARE AT THIS POINT! So what if our bot was crippled? Maybe you were the guy across the field. I'm not caring about you at this point. Any response you make at this point I WILL IGNORE. |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: "Spare Parts" Rules Are Broken
Quote:
Our first year (2000) we made lexan hooks that snaped in a match. We replaced them with aluminum and played in our next match. After that match we went & got ourselves reweighed. We weren't asked to we wanted to. We were slightly over weight, we then took off another component, our arms. Nobody told us to do so, nobody asked us to do so. We knew it was the right thing to do. I am mostly concerned about the way you feel about what happened. Nobody is looking at you and saying "your what's wrong with FIRST." Were saying "how can we help you do what you want to do?" FIRST is about learning & competing but is also about having fun & doing whats right. THere were 60+ other teams at Buckeye, I know I would have been willing to help you. Just ask. BTW: I don't remember if we won or lost the match we played overweight in, that was 5 years ago. I just know how we flet like we had done the wrong thing & had to make it right. & we did. I think i just torn my MCL getting off my soapbox. Ouch |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Uniform rules and enforcers? | Ben Mitchell | General Forum | 31 | 12-01-2005 20:55 |
| Tapping broken taps (a.k.a. I'm all tapped out) | dlavery | Technical Discussion | 28 | 26-06-2004 22:56 |
| Dilemma - Letter of the rules v. spirit of the rules | Natchez | General Forum | 27 | 03-04-2003 15:37 |
| Time for new rules! | archiver | 2001 | 11 | 24-06-2002 02:01 |
| Robot electrical systems rules | Morgan Jones | Rules/Strategy | 5 | 06-01-2002 00:50 |