|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: any of your regional "buddies" with your in your alliance?
Though we werent paired with them i'd love to work with 435 robodogs in Archie. The support given to us by your team at Palmetto was awesome, looking down from my co-drivers position and seeing a sign with "Go 900" on it was a comforting suprise.
Any of the other teams we've worked with at Palmetto would be excellent to be with, being a strategist there were good times planning with all teams. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: any of your regional "buddies" with your in your alliance?
279 is with us(66) in curie. Unfortunatly, we won't get the chance to be paired with 322 for a third time.
Oh, well. Maybe next year... |
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: any of your regional "buddies" with your in your alliance?
1212 and 585 will have a chance to repeat our success together at the AZ Regionals in Newton. It's going to be really hard to go up against former alliance members when you've cheered together and ridden the same rollercoaster of adrenaline when you're playing in elims. 330 and 57, our alliance partner last year, will be far away in other divs
I still have my leopard ears from AZ 2003! |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: any of your regional "buddies" with your in your alliance?
Us (492) is with team 1031 together in galileo division. We won the Pacific NW regional
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| The top 8 teams will be....(2004) | Jessica Boucher | General Forum | 20 | 24-03-2004 22:31 |
| 2004 Championship Eligibility Criteria!!! | dez250 | General Forum | 214 | 28-12-2003 20:11 |
| Chamionship Qualification - feedback needed ASAP! | dlavery | General Forum | 97 | 11-10-2003 07:17 |
| More teams in the elimination rounds | DougHogg | General Forum | 16 | 27-04-2003 16:11 |
| Long post - this year's game was tough - here's why: | archiver | 2001 | 7 | 24-06-2002 03:31 |