|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
| View Poll Results: You Make The Call | |||
| I penalize the Red Alliance six times (60 points) for goaltending |
|
51 | 71.83% |
| I don't penalize the Red Alliance |
|
19 | 26.76% |
| I do something else ... please explain |
|
1 | 1.41% |
| Voters: 71. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: YMTC: Is it goaltending?
The issue here is, I believe, intent. The intent of the rule is to prevent teams from building a device that prevents shots from being scored, or using a ball as such a device. The blue team's behavior breaks neither of these rules. Redabot is trying to play the game correctly, by getting the ball to cap a goal, and the blue team is cheaply trying to use a loophole to score some quick points. If I was a ref, I would award the Blue team no points and a stern lecture.
I'm also of the mind that, if a team doesn't dawdle in capping their opponent's goal, they shouldn't be called for goaltending if a ball or two happens to hit the big ball. The goaltending intent was not there, so the goaltending call shouldn't be there. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| YMTC: Redabot grabs rail | Natchez | You Make The Call | 10 | 10-04-2004 12:16 |
| YMTC: Redabot accidentally breaks goal | Natchez | You Make The Call | 9 | 10-04-2004 12:11 |
| YMTC: Bluabot sits on Redabot | Natchez | You Make The Call | 19 | 08-04-2004 16:43 |
| YMTC: Bluabot and Redabot hanging? | Natchez | You Make The Call | 15 | 23-03-2004 01:42 |
| YMTC: Bluabot dies while pinning | Natchez | You Make The Call | 17 | 21-03-2004 11:33 |