|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Okay, my team mates just came back from CSU at the Buckeye Regional. Here is my 'beef'; if you go onto the first web site and the rules say that 'NO PART OF THE ROBOT CAN BE UNDERNEITH THE GOAL OR IT RESULTS IN A D.Q.' This did not exactly happen in the Elmination Rounds when in our second run not only did a robot's tether go under a goal, but (clearly in our video footage) you can see that the other robot from the opposite alliance was wedged underneith the goal, lifting their back wheels off the ground. The other teams did not recieve a d.q. like a team did the previous day.
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Q&A Discuss: Tethering without being entanglement | CD47-Bot | Extra Discussion | 2 | 06-01-2003 14:10 |
| Tethering without being entanglement | Nelson G | General Forum | 1 | 06-01-2003 07:55 |
| entanglement | roboticscom13 | General Forum | 27 | 30-03-2002 23:23 |
| Entanglement Ruling at VCU | megabass31 | Rules/Strategy | 22 | 17-03-2002 09:02 |
| Can we stand one more thread on entanglement? | Joe Johnson | Rules/Strategy | 6 | 17-01-2002 11:33 |