[moderated] 469 Entanglement / Bad Refereeing on Galileo

[Peter Matteson]

I have to say that many of the adult mentors I was sitting with with in the back of the Galileo stands thought that this looked intentional during the competition and were surprised when there was no penalty. 469 made several questionable (I mean interpretation of not motivation for) moves in the elimination rounds. [Text Deleted by Ddzconfusd]

That being said, did 469 have good bot? Yes.
Did they know how to play the game to win? Yes.
They beat my team fairly in the Galileo finals and deserved to go on to Einstien, and for that I congratulate them. That is not the point. The point is that rules should be called as written and they were not on the Galileo field. I just want to see rules consistently called the way they are written.

[Text Deleted by Ddzconfusd]