|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ok, my last post went bad real quick (mostly my fault) so I'm going to try to keep this one more to the point so I can get some useful feedback.
Here is The Video of the play in question. I have five (5) questions. When replying I would appreciate answers in order with numbers and (optional) justification to make everything easier to read. Here are the questions: (1) Were the two robots (469 and 93) entangled? (2) If yes to (1), which robot initiated the entanglement? (3) If yes to (1), which robot (if any) presented an entanglement hazard? (4) If yes to (2), should that robot have been disabled? (5) If yes to (2) and/or (3), should that team have been disqualified? |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| [moderated] 469 Entanglement / Bad Refereeing on Galileo | RyanMcE | General Forum | 61 | 12-05-2004 12:37 |
| Part Features | Brant Bowen | Inventor | 1 | 19-02-2004 19:25 |
| Can I reduce the number of similar part files? | roknjohn | Inventor | 2 | 29-01-2003 21:36 |
| entanglement | roboticscom13 | General Forum | 27 | 30-03-2002 23:23 |
| Can we stand one more thread on entanglement? | Joe Johnson | Rules/Strategy | 6 | 17-01-2002 11:33 |