|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Arggg stupid css design.....
Im working on a css website and none of the functions are working. I validated that the information is right and the Version of internet explorer I am using is 6.0. In fact the only place that the CSS is being recognized in is Microsoft FrontPage in normal view and not preview. What is wrong?
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Arggg stupid css design.....
Your first problem is FrontPage
![]() I absolutely hate using front page because of all the stupid Microsoft rules and limits they require you to use. It might take you a lot longer, but I'd probably hardcode with notepad...thats usually what I do first. If you want an HTML editor, I'd reccomend getting your hands on a copy of Macromedia Dreamwaver. I use dreamweaver for all my webstuff and it's fairly easy to use and learn. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Arggg stupid css design.....
I am handcoding it. The only thing that will actually recognize my css is Frontpage. Internet Explorer simply refuses to. I wonder if it has anything to do with my school's computer. Its really really freaky.
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Arggg stupid css design.....
Quote:
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Arggg stupid css design.....
Quote:
I'll take a look too if you post it. And what DJ Fluck said-I applaud your handcoding. Never use FrontPage!! (not that we don't all love Microsoft...) |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Arggg stupid css design.....
Chances are that you made a really small syntax error in your HTML code's link, or possibly (but unlikely) in the CSS file itself. FrontPage (and IE) tends to be very forgiving of mistakes or bad code, which is why this is probably the case.
If you have this page uploaded on a web server, I'd be happy to take a look. It's likely that the problem lies in your <link> or <style> tags, or their attributes though, so double-check them first. |
|
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Arggg stupid css design.....
Personally, I think you should try to see if Netscape, Mozilla, or a browser of that sort can view the page also. IE isn't very friendly on reading CSS files I believe.
|
|
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Arggg stupid css design.....
I second the motion to have you show us the code.
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Arggg stupid css design.....
Quote:
But goosh darn it there is something wrong with my school's computers. It simply does not display the fact that there is any css. The only program that actually displayed my css was Frontpage?? There is no errors as I checked on a validator because I couldn't figure out what was happening. It works on my computer now. Could it be the fact that I was using Microsoft Word to type it and not notepad?? Sorry I did not post this sooner I feel asleep. PHP Code:
Last edited by Adam Y. : 21-04-2004 at 20:45. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Arggg stupid css design.....
Hello,
Good job with the hardcoding! What text editor are u using? (If you say vi or notepad, I will adore you, living in the dark ages before syntax highlighting). CSS tends to be very... interesting when coupled with Frontpage. Or Dreamweaver. Trust me, the 98.4mb trial is not worth downloading. Hardcode all the way! I would recommend you try another OS and/or web browser. Usually fixes CSS problems for me. Good luck. |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Arggg stupid css design.....
A quick look at your code suggests that the CSS is working to some extent. I'm seeing stuff on both IE6 and Gecko. Also, you might want to get something that highlights syntax. It would have shown the fact that you didn't close one of your <table> elements. If you tell us what you want to achieve with the file, I could whip something up for you.
Last edited by jonathan lall : 21-04-2004 at 22:12. |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Arggg stupid css design.....
Quote:
Ok, let's see here. Someone already pointed out that you didn't properly close one of the table commands. PHP Code:
With the embedded style sheet (either way, actually), the tables show up- but you need to open and close the <TR> and <TD> tags for the text to show up in the right place- otherwise it ends up outside your tables and the tables then change position to accomodate, so all your .css positioning is pointless. Also, one piece of unsolicited advice. =) You may want to try playing around with div layers and seeing if that helps. They may be easier to work with, depending on what you're trying to do. Your style sheet will work the same way, but you can just change your code from <table class= "topnavbar"> to <div id= "topnavbar" class= "topnavbar">. I think you may be able to do more with the css then. I'm not totally sure, but it's probably worth playing around with. Hope this helps. I think I fixed some stuff but I'm not sure I exactly answers your original question. Maybe if we knew what OS and browser you were using on the school computers compared to what we are all using we'd be able to figure out what does/doesn't support what you're trying to do and possibly fix it. |
|
#13
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Arggg stupid css design.....
Quote:
PHP Code:
|
|
#14
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: Arggg stupid css design.....
Your problem isn't with your css, but with your html.
I've attached screenshots of 3 different browsers rendering of gwross's code and your code. |
|
#15
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Arggg stupid css design.....
Quote:
and in regards to the background-color not working... it's 'cause it should be background-colour [/joke]And does calling the width/height properties for the body tag actually do anything? |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| CSS Based Design | Brandon Martus | Website Design/Showcase | 13 | 07-05-2004 19:46 |
| TechnoKat design usage, communicated with judges | Andy Baker | General Forum | 13 | 24-03-2004 17:37 |
| Design Sharing | Rod | General Forum | 32 | 14-01-2004 22:00 |
| How do you design your robot? | Gui Cavalcanti | General Forum | 23 | 16-11-2003 18:33 |
| Ok, so YOU design the 2003 game... | dlavery | General Forum | 157 | 07-01-2003 23:55 |