|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The Regional Wars
I See what you are getting at, but I was trying to provide an accurate representation of a winning alliance at a regional. The captain of a regional doesnt just get to pick the two best teams, they must make intellegent decisions from a field of remaining robots. I guess I think that some regionals may have a few incredibly strong teams(type a), and others a well rounded field of good teams(type b). The question isnt what regional has the most insanely powerful teams, rather which is most difficult to win. By comparing winning alliances, you can gauge the difficulty of winning different regionals, fielded with different types of teams. I guess I would like to see if it is more difficult to win type a or b. Not which regional has the 3 best teams attending.
|
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The Regional Wars
I know its not cool to be egocentric, but here goes:
The Midwest IS WHERE ITS AT!!! LITERALLY In terms of robotics, the Midwest won at least two years in a row, one year with the winning alliance being made up ENTIRELY of Midwest teams 2003 (Houston, Texas): 469 (Las Guerrillas; Bloomfield Hills, MI), 111 (Wildstang; Schaumburg, IL) and 65 (The Huskie Brigade; Pontiac, MI) 2004 (Atlanta, Georgia): 71 (Team Hammond (aka Beatty); Hammond, IN) , 494 (The Martians; Goodrich, MI), 435 (The Robodogs; Raleigh, NC) 2 of 3 were from the midwest. 2005 (Atlanta, Georgia): 461 (Westside Boiler Invasion; West Lafayette, IN), ???, ??? (the last one was just an egocentric prediction) Anyways, now that I responded with all my egotism, I think its time to get that out and just say that there are great, strong regionals everywhere! (as long as everywhere means Evanston, IL; Ypsilanti, MI; or Cleveland, OH) ![]() |
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: The Regional Wars
Quote:
![]() |
|
#19
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: The Regional Wars
Quote:
|
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: The Regional Wars
Quote:
|
|
#21
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: The Regional Wars
Quote:
|
|
#22
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: The Regional Wars
The south definately has a reputation as being one of the most brutal and defensive regionals out there. Teams like 233 and 79 are just two that i can think off the top of my head that are pretty descriptive of what a good southern robot is like.
|
|
#23
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: The Regional Wars
Of course I know this idea won't happen but anyway... I think the best way to pick the regional teams would be to nominate a captain for each region and let them pick a lineup. Sure deserving teams get left out but selecting teams solely on regional wins or finalist appearances is quite flawed. Not only is there an extremely large amount of luck involved but due to the nature of picking alliances its unlikely that all the best teams are represented in the finals. Even if the #1 seed is the best team and picks the second best team at the competition their third partner will at best be the 17th best team. Keep in mind I think any team that makes it to the elimination rounds is deserving, my point is that often the best teams get spread out amongst the alliances. So I say just pick one of the big names, or a group of them if you prefer, from each region and let them fill out the rosters.
So, I would have the regional captain select 10 teams to represent that region and, just for fun, 2 alternates. The format would consist of a best of five matches between two regions with the winner moving on. Each team plays at most one match per round. Lineups are declared at the beginning of each round with all five of the two-team pairings and the match # they will play in. Although I think you should just give the Midwest the trophy now. 111 & 494 Worked at nationals. 93 & 67 93 catches ALL the balls, 67 caps it and hangs. 33 & 111 33 fills the goal, 111 caps and hangs. 45 & 47 Lots of small balls, 45 caps while 47 hangs. 461 & 469 With both goals full of balls and doubled why hang? Also please keep in mind this is a quick list during my break from circuits. I definitely forgot some teams and, with only 10 spots, didnt get to put in all the great ones I did remember. I would expect anyone given the job of filling out this team for real would have quite the hard time. As far as getting all those teams in one place, well, that would pretty much be impossible but to save on hotel costs everyone can stay at my house! I do think a location could be found within driving distance for a Midwest vs. NE showdown but those Cali teams are so far away... btw... what about the Canadians, or the Brazilians for that matter. -dtk |
|
#24
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: The Regional Wars
Quote:
but this year the northeast had a lot of really good robots.... 365, 222, 25, 175, 303, 11, 237, 88, 56, and many others |
|
#25
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: The Regional Wars
Quote:
2003 finalists: 494 (midwest), 25 (northeast) 2002 Champions: 71, 66 (midwest), and 173 (northest). 2002 Finalist: 308 (midwest), 311 (northeast) 2001 Champions: 71 (midwest), 365 (northeast) 2001 Finalists: 111, 33, 349, 144 (midwest) 2000 Champions: 25 (northeast) 2000 Finalists: 111 (midwest), 126 (northeast) (sorry, my memory is pretty fuzzy from 2000 and 1999) 1999 Champions 176 (northeast), 1 (midwest) 1999 Finalists: 111, 45 (midwest) 1998 Champion: 45 (midwest) 1998 Finalist: 121 (northeast) 1997 Champion: 71 (midwest) 1997 Finalist: 47 (midwest) (Note: 1997 team numbers are the CURRENT numbers for those teams). So, since 1997 (since I've been involved in FIRST), the number of championship and finalist participants have been (according to my fuzzy memory): Midwest: 22 Northeast: 8 Granted, I think I may have missed a couple in 1999 and 2000, but it appears the midwest has the edge. Hey Andy, thanks for getting the ball rolling on the trash-talking thing. ![]() |
|
#26
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: The Regional Wars
Quote:
The northeast will return next year, full force...be afraid, be very afraid! -Andy Grady |
|
#27
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: The Regional Wars
Quote:
The 2000 National Finalists were Teams 126, 131 and 102, all from the Northeast The 1999 National Champions included Team 48, from the Midwest. |
|
#28
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: The Regional Wars
Quote:
You should try and make it to the IRI this year to see how the midwest teams do it up. Oh right! You were at nationals, so by watching the finals you already saw how the midwest teams do it. (This is getting fun!) Okay, Andy - I'm going to stop now (I promise). You should know that I respect the northeast as much as anyone. You guys are great. Seriously though, you should come to the IRI. It's a great time. |
|
#29
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: The Regional Wars
Quote:
229 + 126 vs ANYBODY. You up for it? It's freakin' unbeatable man. ![]() JV |
|
#30
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: The Regional Wars
Quote:
Who knows...maybe at a certain possible undisclosed special event in 2005, we might be able to find out who really is the best region once and for all. By the way, you can keep talking trash all ya want...I think its fun, and it adds to the rivalry...just as long as it stays fun and there are no personal attacks or anything like that. -Andy Grady |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| One-Regional versus Multi-Regional teams | Natchez | Regional Competitions | 25 | 04-20-2004 08:40 PM |
| Top Score overall from regionals | t0ny127 | Regional Competitions | 33 | 04-13-2004 10:30 PM |
| New Canadian Regional | Greg | General Forum | 16 | 04-05-2004 09:14 PM |
| Break Down of Awards By Fields. | Josh Hambright | Championship Event | 13 | 04-09-2003 10:22 AM |
| Regional Team List | Jack | General Forum | 5 | 01-03-2003 12:05 PM |