New divisions at nats?

[Ben Lauer]

Divinci,
Libnitz
Faraday

no, i cannot spele

[Madison]

What about Sally?

[Andy Baker]

Originally Posted by M. Krass

What about Sally?

I DOUBT anyone would be FIREd up about having SMOKEy (and the) BANDITs running around a field of STEEL MAGNOLIAS (aka, good-looking robots). We need to stick to NORMAl, RAEl scientists, even though Sally holds special PLACES IN THE HEART of many FIRSTers.

This would be as silly as a FLYING NUN.

I would NOT go to this field WITHOUT MY DAUGHTER and there would be no ABSENSE OF MALICE if you would SAY IT ISN'T SO.



Andy B.

[George1902]

Wow... I don't know what's scarier: Andy's reply or the fact the it took Andy's reply for me to get M's joke.

Exams have taken their toll I guess.

My vote is for Da Vinci, btw.

[RiceRobotica]

Faraday, Rutherford, Tesla.... Any of those would be good.

[Pin Man]

I'd say Edison and Socrates

[ah27]

My definite favs would be Franklin, and Edison.

[Pin Man]

Is this just hypothetical or are they really thinking to have these two new fields??? I mean because I don't think they could get 2 more fields in there... maybe one if they took away the legos... hmmm...

[Team311]

how bout in keeping with the technology theme the Gates Field or The Torvalds Field or even the Berners-Lee Field

[gsensel]

Wozniak and Jobs sound pretty good

[RBrandy]

Originally Posted by T967

No to Copernicus, he was a lucky fraud. All he did was start a bunch of controversy.

I'd say he's a good cantidate... As the inventor of controversy.

[mtrawls]

What about the Gravity field and the Electric field? Then at the finals, you could talk about the cases where the electric field dominates (or the other way around) ...

Sorry, recovering from a quantum physics test

How 'bout Gauss? I mean, really, Gauss was everywhere. Number theory, imaginary numbers, linear algebra ... and that's not even to mention the half of it, and then there's his physics contributions (a little thing called Gauss's law for starters). Of course, as a programmer, I'd also have to appreciate Turing (previous suggestion).

[Tristan Lall]

Originally Posted by mtrawls

How 'bout Gauss? I mean, really, Gauss was everywhere. Number theory, imaginary numbers, linear algebra ... and that's not even to mention the half of it, and then there's his physics contributions (a little thing called Gauss's law for starters).

Wasn't there a Gauss field in 2001, when they had 4 indoor fields plus the big Einstein bandshell, at Epcot?

[RBrandy]

No... there were only four fields. Einstein was used as a field. The divisions were annotated by a color (Red, White, Blue, and Gold)

[T967]

[QUOTE/]How 'bout Gauss? I mean, really, Gauss was everywhere. Number theory, imaginary numbers, linear algebra ... and that's not even to mention the half of it, and then there's his physics contributions (a little thing called Gauss's law for starters). Of course, as a programmer, I'd also have to appreciate Turing (previous suggestion).[/quote]
Nah we already got two math geniuses. If it came down to it, (I already want davinci) I guess I like the wright's. Those guys got it done. (Plus who better would represent the first american named field. Come-on the guys did what we do in competion every year. They just changed the world.)