|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#46
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: New divisions at nats?
Quote:
lol |
|
#47
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: New divisions at nats?
Quote:
and DaVinci was just awesome. ![]() |
|
#48
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: New divisions at nats?
I'm all for the wrights idea.
|
|
#49
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: New divisions at nats?
Since Newton represents the mechanics and gravitational side of physics, Archimedes represents fluid dynamics (maybe
), Galileo represents astronomy, and Curie represents Nuclear Physics (to some degree), there needs to be a person from Electronics and Magnetism recognized. The robot building is half mechanics and half E&M so E&M should also be recognized. Maybe Gauss, Ampere, or Faraday of course, its time that a field gets named after either an American or an Asian. Joseph Henry Edwin Hubble J. Robert Oppenheimer Benjamin Franklin <insert other Prominent American Scientists here> Industrial/Engineering: Ford Edison Dean Kamen Chandra <instert other Asians here> Last edited by suneel112 : 28-04-2004 at 00:38. |
|
#50
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: New divisions at nats?
Copernicus and Da Vinci get my vote...
|
|
#51
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: New divisions at nats?
Volta, Da Vinci, Edison,
and of course... BAKER and GRADY, the great andys!!! |
|
#52
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: New divisions at nats?
I say DaVinci and Franklin
|
|
#53
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: New divisions at nats?
Quote:
If we do have to sell out, how about "IBM Field" and "Pepsi Field" ? |
|
#54
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: New divisions at nats?
Can I hear a Disney a Disney here??? How about Timken? Can I hear a Timken? What about Goodyear?? I'll give a cookie to whoever can guess what Disney invented. I expect all non-rookie people to know what Timken invented. If not then you either have not read the parts list or do not work on the robot.
![]() Last edited by Adam Y. : 06-05-2004 at 20:14. |
|
#55
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: New divisions at nats?
I cannot believe no one suggested this name:
The V-Neun division. Actually. Remember how Dean said more scientist and engineers should be heroes or role models for the students? I think when you think of new names for the division, you should definitely keep that in mind. Imagine if you have to come up with a short list of 10 names to be top heroes from the science/engineering field, who would they be. Personally, I have a lot of respect for Edison. I read about how he had major difficulties in school when he was young, and about how he was tiredlessly trying to invent new things even when he was small. I thought to myself, "He is a legendary inventor, but he is also a human being who never stop trying. Now that's someone to look up to." Another scientist/engineer I look up to is R. Buckminster Fuller, who forever changed my view of the world ever since I saw a play about him and his experience. But I doubt he is as famous as Newton, Einstein, or Edison. On the side note, I thought how cool it was when Blair went "Gal-il", and the crowd went "le-o" at the beginning of the finals in Atlanta. When you come up with names for new divisions, they better sound interesting when you say the name out loud. I think I remember there used to be a Watt field back in the days, but it went away after the divisions were established since 2001. Boy, what a great decision that was. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Divisions at nationals based on Regions? | Dan Richardson | General Forum | 14 | 03-05-2004 15:46 |
| New additional teams to divisions at Nats | Todd Derbyshire | Championship Event | 1 | 07-04-2003 17:14 |
| Timing of nats for next year | Ian W. | Championship Event | 13 | 03-03-2003 18:28 |
| Nats and Florida | Harrison | Rumor Mill | 3 | 15-10-2002 18:52 |
| So what's everyone's strategy/scouting plan for Nat's? | archiver | 2001 | 8 | 24-06-2002 02:32 |