|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
i agree,
one of teh main entanglement violations was that the tether could not go through a goal. However, the firebirds tether ( i have nothing against thefirebirds. thanks for pickings us and also, their tether is extremely effective and only violated entanglement by chance) went through the goal and they were not DQed. other teams tethers, which were in blatant violation of the rules, like an actual tape measure!! were not DQed. I believe in a kinder, genter FIRST, but not a push-over FIRST |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Q&A Discuss: Tethering without being entanglement | CD47-Bot | Extra Discussion | 2 | 06-01-2003 14:10 |
| Tethering without being entanglement | Nelson G | General Forum | 1 | 06-01-2003 07:55 |
| Entanglement | thedillybar | Technical Discussion | 3 | 27-03-2002 22:22 |
| Entanglement DQ........at CSU | mr_orange650 | Rules/Strategy | 2 | 20-03-2002 17:43 |
| Can we stand one more thread on entanglement? | Joe Johnson | Rules/Strategy | 6 | 17-01-2002 11:33 |