Go to Post The Questions is, do we attempt to build a Mr.Fusion, or do we go for the Plutonium from the Libyans? - dag0620 [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Competition > FRC Game Design
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 07-05-2004, 09:51
Mike Ciance Mike Ciance is offline
Registered User
FRC #0025 (Raider Robotix)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: North Brunswick, NJ
Posts: 693
Mike Ciance has a brilliant futureMike Ciance has a brilliant futureMike Ciance has a brilliant futureMike Ciance has a brilliant futureMike Ciance has a brilliant futureMike Ciance has a brilliant futureMike Ciance has a brilliant futureMike Ciance has a brilliant futureMike Ciance has a brilliant futureMike Ciance has a brilliant futureMike Ciance has a brilliant future
Send a message via AIM to Mike Ciance
Lightbulb Re: [Official 2005 Game Design] OK, so YOU design the 2005 game...

i've already posted many elements of this on other threads but here is the whole thing:

it is called "Cylinder Squares"

the field has red and blue scoring zones against the opposite stations which are lowered 2 inches from the floor level. on each side of the field (the long way) are platforms similar to last year's; 2 6-inch steps. going down the middle of the field would be a 3-foot transparent wall with a gap in the center big enough for one robot. there will be a bar adjoining the two wall sections at the tops.

at the foot-high sections of each of the side platforms will be 6 cylinders (12 in total). these will moved into the scoring zones by the robots, and the score for them will be the number of cylinders squared (1 gets 1 point, 9 get 81 points, etc) as i've said in 2 other posts, this will make the game very exciting and hectic. so the cylinders can be picked up more easily, they will have two holes going all the way through (the short ways) forming an X in the center.

for robot placement scoring, 25 points will be given to robots on the platforms, and 50 points will be given to robots only touching the bar and/or a small designated area of carpet below the bar.

if you want to give your opinion, send me a private message
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 07-05-2004, 18:21
Kris Verdeyen's Avatar
Kris Verdeyen Kris Verdeyen is offline
LSR Emcee/Alamo Game Announcer
FRC #0118 (Robonauts)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 696
Kris Verdeyen has a reputation beyond reputeKris Verdeyen has a reputation beyond reputeKris Verdeyen has a reputation beyond reputeKris Verdeyen has a reputation beyond reputeKris Verdeyen has a reputation beyond reputeKris Verdeyen has a reputation beyond reputeKris Verdeyen has a reputation beyond reputeKris Verdeyen has a reputation beyond reputeKris Verdeyen has a reputation beyond reputeKris Verdeyen has a reputation beyond reputeKris Verdeyen has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [Official 2005 Game Design] OK, so YOU design the 2005 game...

I give you: Trough Tribulations, or The Heavy Ball Follies

The field is the same size to which we've become accustomed. There is a wooden (ok, diamond plate) trough in the middle of the field, about as wide as last year's ramp or this year's center platform, and 3-5 feet long. It can be anywhere from 4" to 2' high, depending on the balance between task difficulty and spectatorworthyness.

In the trough are ten 20 pound medicine balls. There are five black medicine balls, and five white ones, with alternating colors. The object of the game is to have as many of the white ones on your side of the field, and as many of the black ones on your opponent's side of the field at the end of the match. Each white ball on your field is +10 points, each black one is -10 points.

In addition, there are 5 red and 5 blue balls on each end. Each of the colored balls that ends up in the trough at the end is worth 5 points.

Finally, the human player.

Each of the four human players has a "spoiler ball", which will have to be either a playground ball or something similarly lightweight, so it can be thrown. If an even number of spoiler balls ends up in the trough at the end of the game, each blue ball in the trough is doubled. If an odd number ends up there, each red ball is doubled.

Some key points:
1. Medicine balls are heavy. No one will be able to roll around picking them up without that being the only thing they do.
2. Autonomous mode is not special. There are no points or parts of the field that are only available during autonomous.
3. There is no dissimilar way to score points. I'd like for there to be one, but I can't think of one that will fit. Perhaps a KOTH on top of the trough, or in the middle of it, or something.
4. The spoiler ball makes the game uneven, but adds some interesting strategy to it. Human players will decide close games at the end with their shooting.
__________________
...Only a few people are awake and they live in a state of constant total amazement. -JP Shanley, Joe vs. the Volcano
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 07-05-2004, 19:01
hansTP2S's Avatar
hansTP2S hansTP2S is offline
Registered User
no team
Team Role: Student
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: well i was born in michigan
Posts: 43
hansTP2S has a spectacular aura abouthansTP2S has a spectacular aura abouthansTP2S has a spectacular aura about
Re: [Official 2005 Game Design] OK, so YOU design the 2005 game...

Alright, i have already shared my idea in a different thread, so this is my idea. it is not a full idea, just an idea for something that could be part of the game, kind of like hanging, its not the entire game, its a part of it.

It is basically a pseudo-capture-the-flag in which there is one item that starts of on the top of a pole and it is worth an extra X points, this object is symmetrical, one half of it is one alliance's color, the other half is the other color (basically if you were to lay a pillow flat, the top half would be red and the bottom half would be blue). To get those points at the end of the match you must fullfill two requirements: your robot must be on the opponent's half of the field (or maybe up on top of some stairs or something as well) and the item must be laying on your robot somewhere: laying is defined as (this definition is made to make as few loopholes as possible): touching only your robot(not other robots or the ground) and only touching your robot where your color is on the object.

It seems like a good idea, the only problem with it that i can see is another robot can just touch it at the last second. However this could also be seen as an advantage, because it adds a LOT of excitement into the end of the game.
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 20-05-2004, 00:33
Natchez Natchez is offline
Registered User
#0118 (Robonauts)
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Houston
Posts: 189
Natchez has a reputation beyond reputeNatchez has a reputation beyond reputeNatchez has a reputation beyond reputeNatchez has a reputation beyond reputeNatchez has a reputation beyond reputeNatchez has a reputation beyond reputeNatchez has a reputation beyond reputeNatchez has a reputation beyond reputeNatchez has a reputation beyond reputeNatchez has a reputation beyond reputeNatchez has a reputation beyond repute
Toxic Teamwork

Here is a 2 minute explanation of the Toxic Teamwork game.

*****Editor’s note: Bobby is back at the Lone Star Regional after serving this great country for a year overseas. Bobby's words are in {brackets}. As always, this should be read veeeeeeeery slowwwwwwly in a deep Southern accent.

Bobby, welcome back to the FIRST Lone Star Regional. Thank you for everything that you do for our country and I'm sorry that you did not get to see the 2004 competition. {Thanks again for inviting me and I caught some of the 2004 competition on the Internet and it was incredible. There was so much action; I did not know what robot to watch on the field. I think it was even better than the Stack Attack game.} I agree! FIRST did a great job with the game in 2004. This year's game is called Toxic Teamwork because the robots have to clean up all of the "barrels." {Wow! You must mean all of the buckets. The field setup looks much different. What is the object of the game?} Right, there are over 50 buckets in play. If you look at ............ Look, a round is about to start.

(Baaaaaaaaat da baaaaat baaaaaat ............... da bat ... CHARGE! "THEY’RE OFF!") Bobby, do you .... {The robots are moving but they're not moving!} Yea, for the first 10 seconds, the human players drive the robot platforms that we call rovers because they go about as fast as the Mars rovers. {Oh, those blue and red platforms under the robots are NOT part of the robot. That seems silly because wouldn't the human players drive it to the same place every round?} Take a closer look Bobby. The red robots are on the blue rovers and the blue bots are on the red rovers. {Ohhhhhhhhhhh! I get it. So the other team gets to position the opposing bots before they start. That's a great idea!} Exactly, FIRST started implementing a random factor the year of Stack Attack and continued it with the random balls in Raising the Bar now they've raised the bar by randomly positioning the bots before the bots wakeup. {All I can think is goodbye dead reckoning. What will that team 118 do now? } I don't know about 118, but everyone scrambled this year to learn how to use the gyros and IR sensors.

*****Editor's note: The Rovers are 30 x 36 x about 9" tall made of wood with 2 wheels driven (probably directly) with globe motors and have 2 casters. The "control" is a simple 2-channel radio control. The human player has two joysticks that drive the rover with tank drive. The rovers move very, very slow and can not reach midfield in the first 10 seconds. There would be a penalty if the two blue rovers or two red rovers touched before the first 10 seconds. The rovers are very weak and would be pushed around very easily by the typical FIRST robot. For those who think motorized platforms are a little aggressive, read on and you'll discover a way not to have them motorized. The other side of the argument is that this may be a great way to implement robot starting position randomness for years to come.

{Hey, that rover knocked over that stack of buckets.} Yea, some more randomness before things get started. {Did those buckets fall in that bot?} No, each team gets 5 buckets to start the game. They can choose to keep them in their player station which scores 2 points each or put them in their bot and potentially score a bunch of points in the toxic dump area or on the rover.

*****Editor's note: The buckets are 5-gallon buckets that you can get at Home Depot. Please remember that Home Depot's headquarters and the Championships are in the same city; can you say major DONATIONS of 5-gallon buckets!!!! The buckets do not have tops and there is a piece of "foam" glued to the inside bottom of each bucket (about 6 to 12 inches thick) so they do not nest all of the way together therefore it is easy for the audience to tell that they are stacked along with the fact that they will not get stuck inside of one another. One reason that they do not have tops is because it makes them stack easier. Second reason is that tops are not readily available without ordering them. The buckets also have their handle.

There they go! {Wow! They are all crawling off of the platform. I think that I'd just lose the autonomous time and crawl off when I got control.} Bobby, ohhhh no; FIRST thought about that too. If your robot is not off of the platform after the 15 second autonomous period, then your robot does not "wakeup" for an additional 40 seconds and you only have 1 minute to run your bot. {Ohhhhhh, I'd definitely use the autonomous period to drive off of the rover. They seem to all be going to the black bucket.} Yep, the black bucket is worth 10 times that of the orange buckets so everyone tries to get it or at least get close during the autonomous period. {It seems that the rovers have quit moving.} You're right. The human players can not operate the rovers during the autonomous period but as soon as it is over, they have control again.

*****Editor’s note: The Rovers do not need to be motorized for the first 10 seconds. The mats could be used from Stack Attack and the humans could just move the rovers manually. BUT this means that the human players could not move them for the remainder of the match so if they are motorized, then even a team that does not have an operational 'bot still is driving something around and effecting the game.

You're about to see why some call this game "Bucket Bashing." Team 456 is picking up a lot of orange buckets while their partner, team 118, fights team 364 for the black bucket. 364's partner 701 is already putting buckets in the toxic dump. Each bucket in the dump is worth 5 points and if they are stacked upright then they are worth 10 points each because you are saving space in the dump. {What is 118 doing now?} They are stacking the buckets on the rover which is worth 10 points a piece because they will be transported to another more environmentally friendly toxic dump. {Do they get 20 points if they are stacked and on top of the rover?} Exactly! {Why is 364 trying to hang that bucket on the hook?} If they get it on the hook, it is worth 20 points. If you look over there, team 456 is herding buckets and giving them to the human player and they get 2 points per bucket that is left in the player station. {Hey, the rovers keep moving around.} Yep, the human players are positioning them so their team can place the buckets on them. {This game shouldn't be called Toxic Teamwork, it should just be called Crazy! Hey, 364 is going after the red rover. Ohhhhhhhh, what a hit by 118. I guess that's what they get for trying to empty the toxic transporter.

Bobby, you haven't seen anything yet. The robots are about to ........ {GO FOR THE PLATFORM! They are fighting like crazy to get on and under the platform.} Yep, if you get on the platform, you get 50 points and if you are under the platform, you get 25 points. {How high is the platform?} Just 24 inches high. (Mahhhhhhhhhhhhhh ... that's the buzzer) {Wow, that was crazy ... just crazy}

If you're still interested, here is a quick list of thoughts for the game.

-The toxic dumps could be mobile goals just like in the past.
-Toxic dumps could be a community dump with red and blue buckets or they could be red and blue dumps.
-The toxic dumps need to be big. Maybe near the center platform.
-There needs to be some better "candy" for the autonomous mode other than just the black bucket ... i.e. the robots need to have an incentive to do something after they get off of the rover. Maybe have the "candy" disappear (not worth anything) after the autonomous period.
-Rovers could be bigger than 36 x 30
-Buckets could have reflective tape on them like in Stack Attack.

If you're still reading, here are some good & bad points.

The good:
-Buckets are readily available and not easily destroyed
-There is only one scoring object
-The toxic dumps and platforms are easily constructed out of building materials
-Score can change quickly (some may view this as a bad thing)
-There is lots of offense (stacking and moving buckets)
-There is lots of defense (removing buckets and defending the buckets)
-Game is analogous to industrial automation
-Buckets are challenging to manipulate
-Home Depot might pitch in a few thousand 5-gallon buckets
-Small bots might make it on the scene with the under-the-platform-score

The bad:
-Buckets are difficult to throw ... this may be good
-The rovers are motorized ... don't absolutely have to be motorized
-Robots scoring under the platform might not be audience friendly
-Frequencies for rovers may not be available (8 frequencies per field x 4 fields at the Championships). Might have to integrate into the team controller and change the rover brain for each team; not a very good idea.
-Don't know if the rovers will be reliable

Thanks for reading about the Toxic Teamwork game.

Take care,
Lucien
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 20-05-2004, 01:58
RogerR's Avatar
RogerR RogerR is online now
its spelled *ya'll*, not *y'all*
AKA: Roger Riquelme
FRC #3844 (Wildbots)
Team Role: Teacher
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Somerset, KY
Posts: 913
RogerR has a reputation beyond reputeRogerR has a reputation beyond reputeRogerR has a reputation beyond reputeRogerR has a reputation beyond reputeRogerR has a reputation beyond reputeRogerR has a reputation beyond reputeRogerR has a reputation beyond reputeRogerR has a reputation beyond reputeRogerR has a reputation beyond reputeRogerR has a reputation beyond reputeRogerR has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to RogerR Send a message via MSN to RogerR
Re: [Official 2005 Game Design] OK, so YOU design the 2005 game...

ok, i've been thinkin' about this for awhile, and i figured i might as well throw an idea out there... i personally think that the games should be simpler, make teamwork more critical, and be very fast paced.

FIRSTball (ok, maybe the name needs work...)


FIELD
the field is almost a square with 2 ball corrales on each side of the field, and one 4'x 8' goal at each end of the field. the robot starting zones are in the middle of the feild (the colored squares). except for the robot starting zones and the goals, the carpet is solid grey. rules for the ball corrale are similar to this years. the goals are made of a frame that is 10" high going around the section of colored carpet (see pic)

GAME OBJECTS
there are two basic game objects: basketballs and obstacles.
balls
at any given time there are only two balls in play (def: in contact with the feild, a robot, or a HP) when the balls come into contact with the colored carpet inside of the goals, they are considered out of play. any alliance that brings an out of play ball back into play will be penalized. the balls are colored so that when they become out of play, the alliance that they "belonged" to can throw another ball in. the color of the balls doesn't effect scoring. an team can only be in contact with one ball at a time, and can't be in contact for more than 15 secs. at the start of the game, there is a ball in front of each goal.
obstacles
there are two obstacles made of 2.375"OD EMT. there is no point value assigned to them in any way. they are 8' wide and 14" tall. the obstacles start out between robot startin positions. (see pic)

HP
the human players may only interact with the balls while they are in their alliance ball corrales. the HP can only move around in their alliance's half of the field (i.e., they can't go past midfield). the HP players can throw the ball to anywere on the feild, and to other human players and robots.

SCORING
an alliance gets 1 point for putting a ball in the opponents goal, and 3 points for not being in contact with the grey carpet.

i'm sure that i left stuff out, so feel free to point out problems, ask questions, etc.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	field copy.jpg
Views:	200
Size:	84.9 KB
ID:	2249  
__________________
"But to say that the race is a metaphor for life is to miss the point. The race is everything. It obliterates whatever isn't racing. Life is a metaphor for the race." -- Donald Antrim

Last edited by RogerR : 20-05-2004 at 02:03.
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-05-2004, 18:17
Ryan Foley Ryan Foley is offline
Registered User
FRC #5687 (The Outliers)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: ME
Posts: 447
Ryan Foley has a reputation beyond reputeRyan Foley has a reputation beyond reputeRyan Foley has a reputation beyond reputeRyan Foley has a reputation beyond reputeRyan Foley has a reputation beyond reputeRyan Foley has a reputation beyond reputeRyan Foley has a reputation beyond reputeRyan Foley has a reputation beyond reputeRyan Foley has a reputation beyond reputeRyan Foley has a reputation beyond reputeRyan Foley has a reputation beyond repute
Here it goes...

note: this game was created by myself and my girlfriend Melissa Fitta (also registered on CD). This is the 1st of 4 or more games we have created (but the only one we have finished so far)

Troublesome Trash

Basic summary: get the footballs into the trash barrels, then get the trash barrels in your end zone or in one of your 3 barrel holding bins, then get your bot into one of the end zones.

Field: see attached thumbnail. The Alliance Stations are the same as they are this year, as is the field size. The human player stations are where they were this year as well, no there isnt a ball corral. Each human player starts with 5 footballs. 15 footballs are placed along the wall in each end zone. There is an IR beacon in each end zone, and lines along the floor leading from the stairs to the end zones (they arent in the drawing though).

Match Setup: 1:45 of remote controlled play, followed by 15 seconds of autonomous

Scoring:
5 points per football in a trash barrel that is in either your end zone or one of your barrel holding bins
25 points per trash barrel in a barrel holding bin of your color
20 points for each robot of your color that moves itself into your end zone during autonomous*
40 points for each robot of your color that moves itself into your opponents end zone during autonomous*

optional game add on: putting the lid on the trash barrel (and locking the lid clamps) doubles the value of the balls inside.

*= robots must not be in an end zone at the start of autonomous or they will be worth no points (moving out of then back into the same end zone doesnt count). The only exception to this is when a robot starts in one end zone, then moves to the other during autonomous, that is OK.

Note on the midfield barrier: there are 3 ways across, through the pipes (2ft tall, 1.5ft between them), under the platform (12in clearance), or up the stairs and over the platform (6in tall 2ft deep 3ft wide step, 1ft tall 4ft deep 9ft wide platform)

Good things:
-pretty simple
-trash barrels are not designated, so stealing trash barrels is a cool aspect of the game
-autonomous at the end could be interesting
-footballs are harder to pick up (for robots at least)
-think of the robot drive types designed to handle that midfield barrie
-variety of tasks
-think of all the fun things you could do with the robot after competition

Bad things:
-autonomous at end mght be easier or harder, depend on where your bot is when it starts
-trash barrels might break, so it could be 2003 bins all over again
-decreased HP role
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Troublesome Trash field picture.JPG
Views:	185
Size:	94.4 KB
ID:	2256  
__________________
Ryan

FRC #5687: The Outliers [2015-?]
FRC #1995: Fatal Error [2007-2009]
FRC #350: Timberlane Robotics [2001-2004]

FRC/FLL volunteer since 2005

Last edited by Ryan Foley : 23-05-2004 at 19:59.
  #7   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-05-2004, 19:03
Billfred's Avatar
Billfred Billfred is offline
...and you can't! teach! that!
FRC #5402 (Iron Kings); no team (AndyMark)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: The Land of the Kokomese, IN
Posts: 8,490
Billfred has a reputation beyond reputeBillfred has a reputation beyond reputeBillfred has a reputation beyond reputeBillfred has a reputation beyond reputeBillfred has a reputation beyond reputeBillfred has a reputation beyond reputeBillfred has a reputation beyond reputeBillfred has a reputation beyond reputeBillfred has a reputation beyond reputeBillfred has a reputation beyond reputeBillfred has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Here it goes...

Overall, I feel this idea.

Just two things I noticed in the rules...first, I'm not too sure about that HP job. I think we'd do well in the South, since football is king down here. But some of those schools up north may have trouble. Perhaps something more Stack Attack-y?

My other thing is with the pipes in midfield. A foot and a half is pretty skinny, leading me to think that most teams would make their robot N by 18" by 12". That's pretty petite...and if there's one thing we need to keep the "civilian" (for lack of a better word) crowd interested, it's big things with lots of action (hence why I loved FIRST Frenzy). The same thing applies to the field--in 2k3, it was the stack. In 2k4, it was the bar. Every field has to have that THING. I'm not exactly sure what it could be here, though.

But overall, it's a good idea. We need more footballs in FIRST.
__________________
William "Billfred" Leverette - Gamecock/Jessica Boucher victim/Marketing & Sales Specialist at AndyMark

2004-2006: FRC 1293 (D5 Robotics) - Student, Mentor, Coach
2007-2009: FRC 1618 (Capital Robotics) - Mentor, Coach
2009-2013: FRC 2815 (Los Pollos Locos) - Mentor, Coach - Palmetto '09, Peachtree '11, Palmetto '11, Palmetto '12
2010: FRC 1398 (Keenan Robo-Raiders) - Mentor - Palmetto '10
2014-2016: FRC 4901 (Garnet Squadron) - Co-Founder and Head Bot Coach - Orlando '14, SCRIW '16
2017-: FRC 5402 (Iron Kings) - Mentor

93 events (more than will fit in a ChiefDelphi signature), 13 seasons, over 60,000 miles, and still on a mission from Bob.

Rule #1: Do not die. Rule #2: Be respectful. Rule #3: Be safe. Rule #4: Follow the handbook.
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 24-05-2004, 16:16
JoeXIII'007's Avatar
JoeXIII'007 JoeXIII'007 is offline
Pragmatic Strategy, I try...
AKA: Joeseph Smith
FRC #0066
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Ypsilanti, MI (Ann Arbor's shadow)
Posts: 753
JoeXIII'007 has a reputation beyond reputeJoeXIII'007 has a reputation beyond reputeJoeXIII'007 has a reputation beyond reputeJoeXIII'007 has a reputation beyond reputeJoeXIII'007 has a reputation beyond reputeJoeXIII'007 has a reputation beyond reputeJoeXIII'007 has a reputation beyond reputeJoeXIII'007 has a reputation beyond reputeJoeXIII'007 has a reputation beyond reputeJoeXIII'007 has a reputation beyond reputeJoeXIII'007 has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to JoeXIII'007
Re: 2005 tournament ideas

Just a few things

-No balls, no boxes, but a mixture of the two would be something. (example: boulders.)
-Instead of a flat playing surface with an obstacle in the middle (such as this year: a flat playing surface surrounding a platform with a hanging bar), why not a bumpy playing field that would require careful manuevering and construction of a robot's drive train.
-An autonomous mode that has many options other than one. (you can do this and this will happen or you can do this and this will happen. Not just one thing.)
__________________
Joeseph P. Smith
jpthesmithe.com
University of Michigan - Informatics (B. Sci. 2012)
General Purpose Programmer - Cooperative Institute for Limnology and Ecosystems Research (CILER) at NOAA-GLERL
  #9   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 24-05-2004, 16:47
JP_1163's Avatar
JP_1163 JP_1163 is offline
mentor
#1163 (Trojan Horses)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Faulkton, SD
Posts: 90
JP_1163 will become famous soon enoughJP_1163 will become famous soon enough
Re: [Official 2005 Game Design] OK, so YOU design the 2005 game...

Here's a few ideas for someone, somewhere to mull over.

1. Instead of 2x2 competition why not have 3-4 robots working in tandem to complete a number of increasingly complex tasks. If a group, selected randomly, can effectively complete a task another one comes up. Sort of similar to a game where teams have to move or place objects on a pressure sensitive switch instead of knocking it off. In this way another area would become available (via a wall or similar barrier becoming flat or a series of hanging bars placed equal distance apart for teams to grasp alternately) for another challenge. It would be a Mars Rover experience without the 7 minute delay for signals and the resultant feedback.
2. The tasks could become increasingly complex and difficult to attain and the points would then be greater. Cooperation not competition among the alliance but competition among all to get as many points as possible from each trial.
3. I like the idea that even with the auton mode that human players still have a place to participate. I'd still like to see that as a part of any new game.
  #10   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 24-05-2004, 18:07
Petey's Avatar
Petey Petey is offline
Strategy & Gaming
AKA: Chris Peterson
None #1073 (Team F.O.R.C.E.)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Hollis-Brookline, NH
Posts: 644
Petey has a reputation beyond reputePetey has a reputation beyond reputePetey has a reputation beyond reputePetey has a reputation beyond reputePetey has a reputation beyond reputePetey has a reputation beyond reputePetey has a reputation beyond reputePetey has a reputation beyond reputePetey has a reputation beyond reputePetey has a reputation beyond reputePetey has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [Official 2005 Game Design] OK, so YOU design the 2005 game...

I have one very simple suggestion for trial.

Currently, the top 8 are allowed to pick within themselves for the finals. Now, while you do want to reward the top teams for their performances in the qualifying rounds I suggest that, to mix it up:

The top 8 are "frozen"--that is, they cannot pick from within themselves.

Team 8 picks first, and then so on through 7, 6, 5...

The biggest flaw with this idea is that it leaves it so that teams that *do* deserve to qualify for nationals might not. But if that is the issue, than why do we even have finals, and not just go with who did the best during the qualifying matches.

Just something to mull over...

--Petey
__________________

Bio:
Team 1073 alumnus, now Admissions Officer at MIT.

Thanks to all those who have helped me through FIRST over the years.
  #11   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 24-05-2004, 18:21
Steve W Steve W is offline
Grow Up? Why?
no team
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Toronto,Ontario Canada
Posts: 2,523
Steve W has a reputation beyond reputeSteve W has a reputation beyond reputeSteve W has a reputation beyond reputeSteve W has a reputation beyond reputeSteve W has a reputation beyond reputeSteve W has a reputation beyond reputeSteve W has a reputation beyond reputeSteve W has a reputation beyond reputeSteve W has a reputation beyond reputeSteve W has a reputation beyond reputeSteve W has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [Official 2005 Game Design] OK, so YOU design the 2005 game...

We could also have 1, 9, 17 alliance 1
2, 10, 18 alliance 2 etc

This would ensure that the top(debatable) 24 teams are in the elimination rounds. It might also make it harder to win as you robot might not be as compatable with the team that you are alliance partners with.

I like the choosing because of strategy. I also liked the idea of after alliance captain 8 makes his pick then he picks again . thus reversing the choosing teams. Great idea, thanks to whomever origionally thought of it.

Autonomous mode to last a max time but also a minimum time with a point reward that desends after the minimum time. Must be a great enough point allowance to make teams want to try and do. Also will make teams consider when to give up and continue the game.

Hardest thing to do is come up with ideas when they could be useless depending on the main game.
__________________
We do not stop playing because we grow old;
we grow old because we stop playing.
  #12   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 24-05-2004, 18:58
AJunx AJunx is offline
Registered User
#0619
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: VA
Posts: 59
AJunx is a name known to allAJunx is a name known to allAJunx is a name known to allAJunx is a name known to allAJunx is a name known to allAJunx is a name known to all
Re: [Official 2005 Game Design] OK, so YOU design the 2005 game...

FIRST 2005 Game Idea

Title
 Puck Pandemonium
 Donut Disorder
 Donut Discord
(as you can see, I’m still searching for a decent name)

Before I go into a detailed explanation of this game, let me establish the basics. The goal of this game is to put rings (or donuts) on vertical poles mounted on moveable pucks. In order to add some engineering challenges and some spice to the game, each robot starts on top of a octahedral puck, like those used in past FIRST games, which is 6” tall. In order to score points, robots will likely have to dismount from the pucks, manipulate the pucks, and manipulate donuts. To add yet another engineering challenge, a bonus will be given for any robot ending the match on its puck with that puck in the appropriate scoring zone. This game includes a number of ways to score points as well as ways to de-score opponents’ points. Puck Pandemonium will allow for both aggressive defensive and offensive strategies that should make it extremely fun to play as well as to watch.

The rules I have listed are meant to give you an idea of the game structure rather than provide a complete set of rules. I have provided a not-precisely-to-scale diagram of the field for this game as an attachment. If you have any questions or comments please let me know so that I can make improvements to the game.




Field
 The field will retain the dimensions of the 2004 field.
 The robot playing area will be 48 ft. long by 24 ft. wide.
 The total area of the field will be 64 ft. by 24 ft.
 The playing surface will be the same carpet used in 2004.
 On one side of the field, the carpet will be colored blue in the area between 9 ft. from the wall and 19 ft. from the end wall on that side of the field.
 On the other side of the field, the carpet will be colored red in the same fashion.
 The remainder of the carpet will be colored gray (as usual).
 In the center of the field will be a 4 and Ľ in. platform measuring 5 ft. wide by 10 ft. long.
 In the center of the platform will be mounted a pole 2 in. in diameter and 7 ft. tall (measured from the base of the platform).
 On both sides of the platform, two poles will be mounted, each 2 in. in diameter and 5 ft. tall (measured from the base of the platform). Each pole will be 20 ft. from the end wall on its own side. The two poles on either side will be located 4 ft. apart and 2 ft. from a line bisecting the field lengthwise.
 One pressure sensor (similar to those used in Stack Attack) will be located on each side of the playing field, centered between the two side walls and set against the end wall. An infrared beacon will be placed above each pressure sensor on the end wall.
 There will be four octagonal ‘pucks’ having a diameter of 4 ft. from flat side to flat side. Each puck will have 8 casters and its platform height will be 6 in. Each puck will have a single pole 2 in. in diameter and 4 ft. 6 in. high (for an overall height of 5 ft.) located on the puck at one of the puck’s eight vertices.
**Editor’s note – see diagram of field on last page.

Game Piece
 The game piece for this game will be an inner tube or tire approximately 15 in. in diameter and 4 in. in thickness; from here on out, they will be called donuts.
 The donuts will be of three different colors.
 Those donuts starting around the 7 ft. pole will be colored yellow. There will be 10 yellow donuts.
 Those donuts starting around the two 5 ft. poles in the blue carpeted area will be colored red. There will be 10 red donuts on each pole.
 Those donuts starting around the two 5 ft. poles in the red carpeted area will be colored blue. There will be 10 blue donuts on each pole.
 At each human player station there will be 5 yellow donuts. These donuts may only be used if a robot has triggered the pressure sensor on the opposite side of the field during the autonomous period.

Robots
 Robots are to begin the match having dimensions no greater than 30 in. (long) by 24 in. (wide) by 42 in (tall).
 Robots will compete, as in the 2004 game, as a red and as a blue alliance.
 Each robot will begin the match being entirely supported by one of its alliance’s pucks (colored red or blue), with no parts of that robot extending past the edges of the puck.

Autonomous
 The autonomous period will start at the beginning of the match and will continue for 20 seconds.
 In order to gain access to the 10 yellow donuts for the human players on an alliance, the pressure sensor on the opposite side of the field must be triggered during the autonomous period.
 If, during the autonomous period, a robot triggers the pressure sensor on its own side of the field, the 10 yellow donuts will become available to the human player on the opposing alliance.
 If the pressure sensors have not been triggered by the end of the autonomous period, the human players will not be allowed to use the donuts (and therefore not take part in the scoring action).

Scoring
 There are two distinct ways of scoring in this game: 1) placing donuts on the poles located on pucks and 2) being on one of your alliance’s pucks within your alliance’s scoring zone (the red or blue colored zone as defined in the field section) at the end of the match.
1) Donuts on Poles
 When placed on a pole located on a puck, each yellow donut counts 10 points for whichever alliance’s puck it is on.
 When a blue donut is placed on a pole located on a blue alliance puck, it counts 5 points for the blue alliance.
 When a red donut is placed on a pole located on a red alliance puck, it counts 5 points for the red alliance.
 When a blue donut is placed on a pole located on a red alliance puck, it descores any donuts below it for the red alliance.
 When a red donut is placed on a pole located on a blue alliance puck, it descores any donuts below it for the blue alliance.
 Once a donut is on a pole located on a puck, it may not be removed.
2) Robots on Pucks
 Any robot ending the match wholly supported by one of its alliance’s pucks that lies entirely within that alliance’s scoring zone, will receive 50 points.

 The total points possible for an alliance are:
10 yellow donuts on the center pole X 10 points each = 100 points
20 yellow donuts from human players X 10 points each = 200 points
2 X 10 red/blue donuts from poles X 5 points each = 100 points
2 robots X 50 points for being on puck in scoring zone = 100 points
= 500 maximum possible points.

**Editors note – 500 may seem like much too large a number, but please keep in mind that the 2004 game had an even higher maximum number of possible points [21 small balls X 2 sides X 5 points each X 2 (multiplier) + 4 small balls X 10 points each X 2 (multiplier) + 2 robots X 50 points for hanging on the bar] = 600 points). Despite this potential, time limitations as well as the competition between the alliances kept scores down in 2004 and will do so in this game as well.
Attached Files
File Type: doc Diagram of FIRST game idea.doc (24.0 KB, 129 views)
  #13   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 25-05-2004, 12:23
crazyone's Avatar
crazyone crazyone is offline
Philly holds many secrets
AKA: JEREMY D.
#0222 (Tigertrons)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Tunkhannock
Posts: 41
crazyone is on a distinguished road
Re: [Official 2005 Game Design] OK, so YOU design the 2005 game...

Title: Canyon Crossing



Field : The field overall has the same paremeters as last years.Except no massively huge ball drop overhead, and no trigger balls. On the field in front of the player's station there is a seven foot high trough to score 13"balls in. In the middle of the field, there is a 3ft wide gap on each side there is a 1' high wall with a moderate ramp leading away. There also is a 5' high bar that starts at the begining of the red side's ramp and extends to the start of the blue side's ramp. At one end of the gap there is an opening on the red side and at the other end is the blue side's opening. The opening is wide enough for only 1 robot to pass through.


Game Piece : on each side there are about 20 13"balls which are for the other side and are worth 5 points each FOR THE OTHER SIDE. The human player has 4 10 point 13" balls which he/she places on the field for the other alliance. The alliances are 2 robots per side.

Robots :


Autonomous

Scoring
__________________
"For every invention that is created many others have failed. Also for every invention that does make it to reality there was someone who had the inspiration, courage, and determination to do so."
-My posts are meerly my opions and not of my team.-

Last edited by crazyone : 26-05-2004 at 09:01. Reason: uncompleted
  #14   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 25-05-2004, 22:53
Petey's Avatar
Petey Petey is offline
Strategy & Gaming
AKA: Chris Peterson
None #1073 (Team F.O.R.C.E.)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Hollis-Brookline, NH
Posts: 644
Petey has a reputation beyond reputePetey has a reputation beyond reputePetey has a reputation beyond reputePetey has a reputation beyond reputePetey has a reputation beyond reputePetey has a reputation beyond reputePetey has a reputation beyond reputePetey has a reputation beyond reputePetey has a reputation beyond reputePetey has a reputation beyond reputePetey has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Here it goes...

From what I'm seeing, this game is an awful lot like "Fireball", a game I used to play in gym class.

What about this:

For some reason--crossing a line, breaking a beam, or just an arbitrary zap--your robot is disabled, and to be re-enabled your human player has to get a football or something into a bin or through a hoop.

Obviously, the biggest difficulties here are:
1) Danger. You get all those footballs flying around and someone is gonna get hit.
2) Impediments. One of the things our team practiced for this year's game was throwing a thirteen inch ball over the wall, over the stationary goal, under the bar, so it would hit the middle pole in the stationary goal and uncap a 2x multiplier. We got it to work a couple times in practice, but it was always too difficult given the angle at which the ball had to be thrown due to the "alliance wall". Of course, it would be easier with a football...

Hmmm...

I definitely like the idea of making the human player's role a physically challenging one. That really promotes a more "well rounded" FIRST ideal, even if it is only coming from individuals. That could be the football and baseball player in me talking, though.

--Petey
__________________

Bio:
Team 1073 alumnus, now Admissions Officer at MIT.

Thanks to all those who have helped me through FIRST over the years.
  #15   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 26-05-2004, 10:00
crazyone's Avatar
crazyone crazyone is offline
Philly holds many secrets
AKA: JEREMY D.
#0222 (Tigertrons)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Tunkhannock
Posts: 41
crazyone is on a distinguished road
Re: [Official 2005 Game Design] OK, so YOU design the 2005 game...

* this is the completed post i had tried to post several times over*

Title: Canyon Crossing

Field : The field overall has the same paremeters as this years.Except no massively huge ball drop overhead, and no trigger balls. On the field in front of the player's station there is a seven foot high trough to score 13"balls in. In the middle of the field, there is a 3ft wide gap on each side there is a 1' high wall with a moderate ramp leading away. There also is a 5' high bar that starts at the begining of the red side's ramp and extends to the start of the blue side's ramp. At one end of the gap there is an opening on the red side and at the other end is the blue side's opening. The opening is wide enough for only 1 robot to pass through.


Game Piece : on each side there are about 20 13"balls which are for the other side and are worth 5 points each FOR THE OTHER SIDE. The human player has 4 10 point 13" balls which he/she places on the field for the other alliance. The alliances are 2 robots per side.

Robots : The robots have the same dimensions as this year. They have to cross the gap in order to retrive points though. They can cross either by traversing the Bar, crossing a "bridge" robot, be thier own bridge, or enter the gap on one side cross the gap, and exit on the other side. the robot may collect balls and score or herd to human player so that he/she may score. Human players place 4 10 point 13" balls on the field before auton begins. These balls are also for the other side. The opponents balls are worth points only after they have been scored for the opponent for five seconds, otherwise they are deducted from your final score at full value.

Autonomous : Starts after HP places their 4 10 point balls for the other side on the field. Robot may do what it does for 30 seconds.

Scoring: assuming we are RED
5 points for each 5 point red ball
2 points for each 5 point blue ball
10 points for each 10 point red ball
5 points for each 10 point blue ball
20 points for each hanging red robot in the gap.

so have 10 red 5 point balls, 3 blue 5 point balls, 2 red 10 point balls, 3 blue 10 point balls, 2 robots hanging.
We have (10*5)+(3*2)+(2*10)+(3*5)+(2*20)=131
Qualifying points are Winner get 2x loser's score and loser keeps thier as QP.
Elims. are best of three winner moves on.

( I will try to draw this field layout up and post as soon as possible )
__________________
"For every invention that is created many others have failed. Also for every invention that does make it to reality there was someone who had the inspiration, courage, and determination to do so."
-My posts are meerly my opions and not of my team.-

Last edited by crazyone : 26-05-2004 at 10:03. Reason: Touch ups
Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2002 game prediction contest!!! Ken Leung Rumor Mill 41 31-12-2007 18:18
On Game Design Matt Leese General Forum 38 30-04-2004 19:08
game design challenge: what was your entry Ryan Foley General Forum 1 20-03-2003 21:42
Ok, so YOU design the 2003 game... dlavery General Forum 157 07-01-2003 23:55


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 14:59.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi