Avril Lavigne

[sanddrag]

I was watching Avril Lavigne on the Today show this morning and I confirmed something I had noticed when watching her live before. She is much worse in person than on the actual recordings. Does anyone else think that? I would have turned it off but I couln't find my remote. Is she bad all the time and digitally made to sound good in the records or is she only bad in person? What do you think?

[Jay H 237]

I never heard her in person so I can't compare a recording of her to her actual voice. I do like her recording voice and have her album.

[Raven_Writer]

She's not all that great live. I remember when she did a cover for "Fuel" during the MTV 20 century thing w/ Metallica. She just stood there, which made the act really boring to.

[Cory]

Every artist sounds worse live than on their recordings. Whether Avril is significantly worse than everyone else is not something I would know about however

I can tell you I think her music sucks, imho

Cory

[Billfred]

I didn't see the performance, so I can't really pass judgment on it. Although you've got to remember that they get lots of chances to get it right in the studio.

I also noticed this phenomenon with Evanescence when I got one of their shows. Then again, Amy Lee tends to be pretty active on stage. It's hard to do that and sing well.

[Pat Fairbank]

I happened upon a recording of one of her concerts once on TV, and I from what I heard, I think she always sounds bad. Well, the only thing that was really wrong was that she was horribly out of tune. Since from my experience good musicians are always concious of their pitch, this leads me to conclude that Avril Lavigne is this bad all the time, and her voice is digitally altered to sound in tune for her CDs.

[Andy Baker]

Originally Posted by Cory

Every artist sounds worse live than on their recordings.
I can tell you I think her music sucks, imho
Cory

Cory, you need to see more concerts. While I agree that Avril's music sucks, you are way wrong with the first sentence... you just need to see the right artist at the right time. Sometimes, it's a crap shoot and you don't know what you are getting, while other times I have been amazed.

For instance, I was really excited to see Van Halen (with Hagar) in the early 90's, but they were not good. On the other hand, I had tickets to see Elton John in the mid-nineties and was entirely blown away. His music was waay better live compared to what his albums put out.

Also, the Cure and Motley Crue had better music live compared to their album stuff. It really depends on the artist, their experience, and their ability to put on a show. My wife likes Steve Earle, and he is much better live.

I suppose that if an artist is younger, their stage show may lack skill, just because they need more experience.

for what that was worth, which isn't much,
Andy B.

[shyra1353]

Originally Posted by Billfred

I also noticed this phenomenon with Evanescence when I got one of their shows. Then again, Amy Lee tends to be pretty active on stage. It's hard to do that and sing well.

actually a lot of artists do that (there was the whole britney spears incident a while ago) ... but if you think about the dance moves that performers like britney spears, beyonce, usher, justin timberlake, etc. do when they are on stage, no matter what kind of shape they are in (like usher with is 12 pack of abs), they have to breathe.
but when you think about it, what would you rather pay for .. someone sitting/standing still and singing at a similar quality to the cd (you can look at a picture and listen to the cd then ... save you some money ) or go and see a high energy show where the singing is prerecorded but you can only tell sometimes ??

but in terms of avril, yeah she is WAY worse in person, and she doesnt move around a lot, so i cannot think of an excuse for her .. but so is mario winans (sp ? ) who i saw him doing a live performance on tv .. a lot of artists are

[DanL]

Originally Posted by Cory

Every artist sounds worse live than on their recordings. Whether Avril is significantly worse than everyone else is not something I would know about however

I can tell you I think her music sucks, imho

Cory

I'm going to hop onto the your-wrong-here bandwagon ;-)

I'm a big Dave Matthews Band fan. Their album stuff is okay, but their real magic lies in their concerts. They do so much more stuff live - they just take the music to the next level. At every concert they take atleast one or two songs, twist them around, and end up making a 10-minute jam.

It is because of this ability that an entire bootleg community has grown up around DMB. For example, you can download just about any DMB concert from the early 1990's at antsmarching.org. When I introduce people to DMB, I send them extended jam versions of songs from concerts I've been to. Granted, since these are bootlegs, the quality is not top-notch, but all that can be disguised with enough equalizers and DSP plugins ;-) That and they have released several live CDs like Red Rocks and Central Park where the recording is straight off the venue's mixing board (and so, sounds studio-quality).

By the way, the band allows bootleg audio recording at concerts and actually encourages it - thats how they grew from a band origionally popular only with the college demographic.

Long story short - some bands sound better live than they do on studio releases.

[MPblankie]

As a general rule, I don't like. Never have, probably never will. She is a typical sellout.

[Greg McCoy]

I agree Dan...There are plenty of other bands like this, but DMB is one of my favorites as well.

Originally Posted by shyra1353

but when you think about it, what would you rather pay for .. someone sitting/standing still and singing at a similar quality to the cd (you can look at a picture and listen to the cd then ... save you some money ) or go and see a high energy show where the singing is prerecorded but you can only tell sometimes ??

Some people can do both.

(By the way, The Central Park Concert is awesome...I've got the 3 CDs and the 2 DVDs and I like it better than any DMB studio album...The quality and technology behind live performances now is just amazing.)

[DanL]

Originally Posted by Greg McCoy

(By the way, The Central Park Concert is awesome...I've got the 3 CDs and the 2 DVDs and I like it better than any DMB studio album...The quality and technology behind live performances now is just amazing.)

The central park show in general was amazing - I was there that night ;-) I'm just disapointed they didn't play Tripping Billies - thats one of my favorite DMB songs. The version I have from the August 25th show this past summer (to which my tickets were a birthday present for my sister ;-)) has so much energy - Carter went insane with the rhythms and the drums. PM me and I'll send it to you or you can get it off of antsmarching.org

Anyways, more on-topic - I think that artists can be divided into two groups. There are the plain songwriter types that are more mainstream (like the origional subject of this post), and then there are the musician types like DMB or Phish. I love to see the musician types perform because they often improvise their songs or change them around, add parts, extend parts, put parts of other songs into their songs... you know, put some creativity and energy into the concert. I'm probably exagerating this a bit, but the point remains - some bands, like DMB, if you just know them from their studio release stuff, if you were to go to one of their concerts, it will seem like a completely new band.

[Andy A.]

Her music may not be my cup of tea, but I have to give her some respect for sounding so bad live.

It means she's acutally singing.

-Andy A.

[Ryan Dognaux]

As many have said, some bands / singers are better live than on CD, some aren't. That's just the way it is. I saw Green Day live and they are just as good if not better live.

[Jeff Rodriguez]

Add PUSA to the better in concert list.

I don't like Avril Lavinaneninean, or how ever you spell that. Her singing on the album isn't very impressive, so naturally her live stuff eats it.