|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
If you are a registered FIRSTwiki user, please go check out the Nominations for Sysops.
The current Nominees are:
The current Sysops are:
PLEASE NOTE: Only vote/nominate if you are logged in. If an IP address appears as the contributor, we will assume you are an anonymos editer and act apropriately. Last edited by Astronouth7303 : 10-06-2004 at 13:23. |
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: FIRSTwiki: Sysops
Hah. I think I forgot to log in when accepting. Whoops.
|
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: FIRSTwiki: Sysops
I dont think FIRSTwiki type of thing will EVER work. It's way to easy for people to abuse it. I think it's a good thought, but these types of way open sourced/ commenting type of things will never work. I dont know how other wiki's prevent abuse, but I think its something that will never fly.
|
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: FIRSTwiki: Sysops
We just had a case of that. He's now blocked.
[PS: 1110 Pages, 71 users] Last edited by Astronouth7303 : 13-06-2004 at 19:55. Reason: grammer |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: FIRSTwiki: Sysops
Quote:
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: FIRSTwiki: Sysops
To add to what mtrawls said, Wikipedia is larger than any other encyclopedia in many measures. There are hundreds of other wiki's on the web. It is becoming standard practice to use wiki's for creating documentation for software. It isn't exactly something new we are doing here. Just new to FIRST.
As wiki users say again and again to skeptics, just try it for yourself, you will soon understand. |
|
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: FIRSTwiki: Sysops
Quote:
Personally, I think wikipedia's success is fairly good proof that its not. |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: FIRSTwiki: Sysops
Bah! I'm pretty darn conservative myself, and I like the wiki idea. IMHO, your acceptance at first depends on your exposure and your inclination to technology (esp. OSS). To the non-computer programmer types out there, you do have to admit that an open content system like FIRSTwiki seems doomed to failure -- it's quite amazing, however, that this isn't the case. Of course, if you've been exposed to other projects and seen them work ... or seen them fail, that affects your opinion too. I think you're just noticing (from a sample size of 1?) that computer people and OSS people in general tend to have libertarian/liberal leanings ... but not all.
(And for the record, I'm more of a libertarian, but I lean more to the conservative end of the spectrum than the liberal end ... typically a lot more.) |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: FIRSTwiki: Sysops
Interesting that you say that, ESR writes in the Jargon File that Linux/GNU/OSS/whatever advocates lean more towards conservative. Libertarian I am, and conservative I lean. I think there is an association between logic/science minded people and conservatism, but there is not a relationship between OSS and liberalism.
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: FIRSTwiki: Sysops
Perhaps I just read slashdot too much.
![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| FIRSTwiki: Why haven't you helped out? | mtrawls | FIRSTwiki | 23 | 13-06-2004 17:25 |
| FIRSTwiki Motto Tie-Breaker | SilverStar | FIRSTwiki | 4 | 09-06-2004 00:21 |
| The FIRSTwiki | Max Lobovsky | FIRSTwiki | 62 | 03-06-2004 16:05 |
| FIRSTwiki: Motto selection | SilverStar | FIRSTwiki | 5 | 02-06-2004 22:16 |
| FIRSTWiki | phrontist | FIRSTwiki | 25 | 24-05-2004 22:33 |