Go to Post not national champ.....WORLD CHAMPION - Stephen Kowski [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Competition > Rules/Strategy
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #29   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 16-07-2004, 09:14
Jeff Waegelin's Avatar
Jeff Waegelin Jeff Waegelin is offline
El Jefe de 148
AKA: Midwest Refugee
FRC #0148 (Robowranglers)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Greenville, TX
Posts: 3,132
Jeff Waegelin has a reputation beyond reputeJeff Waegelin has a reputation beyond reputeJeff Waegelin has a reputation beyond reputeJeff Waegelin has a reputation beyond reputeJeff Waegelin has a reputation beyond reputeJeff Waegelin has a reputation beyond reputeJeff Waegelin has a reputation beyond reputeJeff Waegelin has a reputation beyond reputeJeff Waegelin has a reputation beyond reputeJeff Waegelin has a reputation beyond reputeJeff Waegelin has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Yellow card / Red card usage at 2004 IRI

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt Adams
I'll admit that this will take swift action by one ref or nearly instant voting, but nevertheless, I think that this sort of penalty should be used more often in gameplay.
The one real problem with that is, it's really tough to make a disable call that quickly. I had to make a couple disable calls at IRI on robots that were outside the playing field and/or damaging the field barriers. Both are fairly straightforward calls, but I was still hesitant and unsure what to do, because disabling a robot can have such a dramatic effect on a match. If it's that tough to quickly call a disable on a robot that has fallen over and gotten entangled, and essentially out of the match, imagine how tough it would be to disable a robot on what is essentially a judgement call by one person.

I think if FIRST were to implement a disable penalty system like you suggest, the rules for disables would need to be extremely well-defined. If you rely on one lone referee to make a snap judgement, you open up the whole situation for argument. And, even with well-defined disable rules, you will still have plenty of controversy every time a robot gets shut off. No matter how defined the rules are, teams will always complain and say the rule does not apply in that situation.

The current system of DQs and the IRI card system aren't perfect, but it's a lot more reliable than instant disables, IMHO. Having had to make calls with far less gravity and ambiguity, I don't think it's a better solution. If it could be made completely objective and defined, it might work, but any time you leave total decision power to one person in the heat of the moment, you're asking for trouble.
__________________
Jeff Waegelin
Mechanical Engineer, Innovation First Labs
Lead Engineer, Team 148 - The Robowranglers
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2004 IRI (Indiana Robotics Invitational) Chris Fultz Off-Season Events 147 24-04-2007 23:33
How Many FIRST shirts do you own? Joe Ross General Forum 81 31-08-2004 10:36
2004 IRI Music Thread Ryan Dognaux Off-Season Events 86 06-07-2004 22:49
Announcement: The 2004 IRI Talent Show! Amanda Morrison Off-Season Events 22 10-06-2004 01:33
White Paper Discuss: 2004 IRI Description and Details CD47-Bot Extra Discussion 1 12-05-2004 16:03


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 15:03.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi