|
|
|
 As engineers we should aspire to create, not destroy. If this is the case, why would we want to create machines with the sole purpose to destroy?
- WakeZero [more] |
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
| As engineers we should aspire to create, not destroy. If this is the case, why would we want to create machines with the sole purpose to destroy?
- WakeZero [more] |
|
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#7
17-07-2004, 20:45
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: [FVG]: Making the Final Decisions
Another suggestion I will make, is the creation of a "roadmap" consisting of what you plan to complete by when. It would only be very tentative, and have to be changed frequently as new decisions are made, ... but it is something that would be very useful. Consider,
Jul 23: Objectives defined Jul 29: Very rough outline of game structure Jul 30 - Aug 10: Debate Aug 11: New outline (Random dates used, just to drive the point home. Include more things you need to do, etc.) Also note that documentation like this, the eventual outline, etc., make the whole project look more official, which is good from the standpoint of getting FIRST to give permission to use their logo, or other outside contact (like Sourceforge). 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| [FVG]: Choosing an Engine: Final Poll | Astronouth7303 | FIRST-related Organizations | 44 | 05-07-2004 11:17 |
| [FVG]: Final Decisions | Mike Ciance | FIRST-related Organizations | 0 | 03-07-2004 14:40 |
| [FVG]: Decisions | Mike Ciance | FIRST-related Organizations | 11 | 03-07-2004 14:29 |
| [FVG]: Final Name Poll | Mike Ciance | FIRST-related Organizations | 8 | 24-06-2004 14:08 |
Threaded Mode