|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Why not do both?
Another jab back...
Some of the ball teams can out push most of the goal grabbers and can hold their own against all but the most powerful (60, 254, 469). Teams like 45, 67, and 111 come to mind. (I'm sure more teams should be added to both lists, but I'm only including those I have seen first hand) And as I'm sure you will include in your longer post James, the ball grabbers are usually the ones who seed well and rely on the dominant goal grabbers to help them in the elims. Without the power of the dedicated goal movers we'd be in trouble. Mike |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Regional & Division winners, did you shift gears or not? | DougHogg | Technical Discussion | 34 | 02-05-2003 16:10 |
| Regional Chairman's Winners | starshrike | Chairman's Award | 23 | 07-04-2003 12:39 |
| Regional Winners? | Eric Bareiss | Regional Competitions | 9 | 08-03-2003 17:25 |
| Even more interesting numbers: Division of regional winners | archiver | 2001 | 8 | 24-06-2002 03:10 |
| Congratulations to the Regional Chairman's Award Winners... | Kyle Hill | Chairman's Award | 2 | 09-04-2002 20:48 |